Lably
Skip to content

Unicameralism

Governmental practice of having a single legislative or parliamentary chamber

  • 9 min read
  • 5 chapters

Learn it on Lably

Sometimes, as in New Zealand and Denmark, unicameralism comes from the abolition of one of two bicameral chambers, or, as in Sweden, through the merger of the two chambers into a single one, while in others a second chamber has never existed from the beginning.

Rationale for unicameralism and criticism

The principal advantage of a unicameral system is more efficient lawmaking, as the legislative process is simpler and there is no possibility of deadlock between two chambers. Proponents of unicameralism have also argued that it reduces costs, even if the number of legislators stays the same, since there are fewer institutions to maintain and support financially. Popular among 20th-century democratic countries, unicameral, proportional legislatures were seen by nascent nations as both more democratic and effective. However, at the tail end of the 20th century, the trend in favour of unicameral legislatures over bicameral legislatures started to reverse, with a trend of countries starting to either restore or create Upper houses with the objectives of achieving greater checks and balances, representation, and/or legislative oversight, causing the number of bicameral parliaments to rise from some 45 countries at the beginning of the 1970s to more than 80 in 2024.

Proponents of bicameral legislatures say that having two legislative chambers offers an additional restraint on the majority, though critics note that there are other ways to restrain majorities, such as through non-partisan courts and a robust constitution.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Politics and economics