Sociobiology

History

The philosopher of biology Daniel Dennett suggested that the political philosopher Thomas Hobbes was the first proto-sociobiologist, arguing that in his 1651 book Leviathan Hobbes had explained the origins of morals in human society from an amoral sociobiological perspective.

The animal behavior geneticist John Paul Scott coined the word sociobiology at a 1948 conference on genetics and social behavior, which called for a conjoint development of field and laboratory studies in animal behavior research.

Once a specialist term, "sociobiology" became widely known in 1975 when Wilson published his book Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.

The biological anthropologist Edward H. Hagen writes in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology that sociobiology is, despite the public controversy on its application to humans, "one of the scientific triumphs of the twentieth century." He adds that "Sociobiology is now part of the core research and curriculum of virtually all biology departments, and it is a foundation of the work of almost all field biologists." Sociobiological research on nonhuman organisms has increased dramatically and continuously in the world's top scientific journals such as Nature and Science. The more general term behavioral ecology is commonly substituted to avoid the public controversy.

Theory

Natural selection

Sociobiologists maintain that human and other animal behavior can be partly explained as the outcome of natural selection. They contend that to understand behavior fully, it must be analyzed in terms of evolution, principally by natural selection. Sociobiology is based upon two fundamental premises:

• Certain behavioral traits are inherited,
• Inherited behavioral traits have been honed by natural selection and were adaptive in the environment in which they evolved.

Sociobiology uses Nikolaas Tinbergen's four questions to search for explanations of animal behavior. Two of these categories are at the species level; the other two, at the individual level. The species-level categories (often called "ultimate explanations") are

• the adaptive function that a behavior serves and
• the historical evolutionary process (phylogeny) that resulted in this functionality.

The individual-level categories (often called "proximate explanations") are

• the development of the individual (ontogeny) and
• the proximate mechanism (such as brain anatomy and hormones).

In humans

Behavioral traits such as creativity, extroversion, aggressiveness, and IQ have high heritability. Researchers are careful to point out that heritability does not constrain the influence that environmental or cultural factors may have on these traits.

Various theorists have argued that in some environments criminal behavior might be adaptive. The evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory, by the sociologist Lee Ellis, posits that sexual selection by women has led to increased competitive behavior among men, sometimes resulting in criminality. In another theory, the evolutionary psychologist Mark van Vugt argues that a history of intergroup conflict for resources between men have led to differences in violence and aggression between men and women. The novelist Elias Canetti has described applications of sociobiological theory to cultural practices such as slavery and autocracy.

Genetics

Genetic mouse mutants illustrate the power that genes exert on behavior. For example, the transcription factor FEV (aka Pet1), through its role in maintaining the serotonergic system in the brain, is required for normal aggressive and anxiety-like behavior. Thus, when FEV is genetically deleted from the mouse genome, male mice will instantly attack other males, whereas their wild-type counterparts take significantly longer to initiate violent behavior. In addition, FEV is required for correct maternal behavior in mice, such that offspring of mothers without the FEV factor do not survive unless cross-fostered to wild-type female mice.

A genetic basis for instinctive behavioral traits among non-human species is commonly accepted by biologists; but attempts to explain complex behaviors in human societies with genetics has remained extremely controversial.

Reception

The cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker argues that critics have been overly swayed by politics and a fear of biological determinism, accusing among others the paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould and the evolutionary biologist Richard Lewontin of being "radical scientists", whose stance on human nature is influenced by politics rather than science, while Lewontin, the neuroscientist Steven Rose and the psychologist Leon Kamin, who drew a distinction between the politics and history of an idea and its scientific validity, argue that sociobiology fails on scientific grounds. Gould grouped sociobiology with eugenics, criticizing both in his 1981 book The Mismeasure of Man. When the cultural anthropologist Napoleon Chagnon scheduled sessions on sociobiology at the 1976 American Anthropological Association convention, other scholars attempted to cancel them with what Chagnon later described as "Impassioned accusations of racism, fascism and Nazism"; Margaret Mead's support caused the sessions to occur as scheduled.

During a 1976 meeting of the Sociobiology Study Group, the philosopher and linguist Noam Chomsky argued for the importance of a sociobiologically informed notion of human nature. He stated that human beings are biological organisms and ought to be studied as such, with his criticism of the "blank slate" doctrine in the social sciences, in his 1975 Reflections on Language. Chomsky further hinted at the possible reconciliation of his anarchist political views and sociobiology in a discussion of the anarchist Russian political philosopher Peter Kropotkin's 1902 book of essays Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. Kropotkin focused more on altruism than aggression, suggesting that anarchist societies were feasible because of an innate human tendency to cooperate.

Wilson said he had never meant to imply what ought to be, only what is the case. However, some critics countered that the language of sociobiology readily slips from "is" to "ought", an instance of the naturalistic fallacy. Pinker has argued that opposition to stances considered anti-social, such as ethnic nepotism, is based on moral assumptions, meaning that such opposition is not falsifiable by scientific advances.