Lably
Skip to content

Structure factor

  • 17 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Diffraction, Crystal structure and Square (algebra)

Confusingly, there are two different mathematical expressions in use, both called 'structure factor'. One is usually written S(q); it is more generally valid, and relates the observed diffracted intensity per atom to that produced by a single scattering unit. The other is usually written F or Fhkℓ and is only valid for systems with long-range positional order — crystals. This expression relates the amplitude and phase of the beam diffracted by the (hkℓ) planes of the crystal ((hkℓ) are the Miller indices of the planes) to that produced by a single scattering unit at the vertices of the primitive unit cell. Fhkℓ is not a special case of S(q); S(q) gives the scattering intensity, but Fhkℓ gives the amplitude. It is the modulus squared |Fhkℓ|2 that gives the scattering intensity. Fhkℓ is defined for a perfect crystal, and is used in crystallography, while S(q) is most useful for disordered systems. For partially ordered systems such as crystalline polymers there is obviously overlap, and experts will switch from one expression to the other as needed.

The static structure factor is measured without resolving the energy of scattered photons/electrons/neutrons. Energy-resolved measurements yield the dynamic structure factor.

Derivation of S(q)

Consider the scattering of a beam of wavelength λ by an assembly of N particles or atoms stationary at positions Rj,j=1,…,N. Assume that the scattering is weak, so that the amplitude of the incident beam is constant throughout the sample volume (Born approximation), and absorption, refraction and multiple scattering can be neglected (kinematic diffraction). The direction of any scattered wave is defined by its scattering vector q. q=ks−ko, where ks and ko ( |ks|=|k0|=2π/λ) are the scattered and incident beam wavevectors, and θ is the angle between them. For elastic scattering, |ks|=|ko| and q=|q|=4πλsin⁡(θ/2), limiting the possible range of q (see Ewald sphere). The amplitude and phase of this scattered wave will be the vector sum of the scattered waves from all the atoms Ψs(q)=∑j=1Nfje−iq⋅Rj

For an assembly of atoms, fj is the atomic form factor of the j-th atom. The scattered intensity is obtained by multiplying this function by its complex conjugate

The structure factor is defined as this intensity normalized by 1/∑j=1Nfj2

If all the atoms are identical, then Equation (1) becomes I(q)=f2∑j=1N∑k=1Ne−iq⋅(Rj−Rk) and ∑j=1Nfj2=Nf2 so

Another useful simplification is if the material is isotropic, like a powder or a simple liquid. In that case, the intensity depends on q=|q| and rjk=|rj−rk|. In three dimensions, Equation (2) then simplifies to the Debye scattering equation:

An alternative derivation gives good insight, but uses Fourier transforms and convolution. To be general, consider a scalar (real) quantity ϕ(r) defined in a volume V; this may correspond, for instance, to a mass or charge distribution or to the refractive index of an inhomogeneous medium. If the scalar function is integrable, we can write its Fourier transform as ψ(q)=∫Vϕ(r)exp⁡(−iq⋅r)dr. In the Born approximation the amplitude of the scattered wave corresponding to the scattering vector q is proportional to the Fourier transform ψ(q). When the system under study is composed of a number N of identical constituents (atoms, molecules, colloidal particles, etc.) each of which has a distribution of mass or charge f(r) then the total distribution can be considered the convolution of this function with a set of delta functions.

with Rj,j=1,…,N the particle positions as before. Using the property that the Fourier transform of a convolution product is simply the product of the Fourier transforms of the two factors, we have ψ(q)=f(q)×∑j=1Nexp⁡(−iq⋅Rj), so that:

This is clearly the same as Equation (1) with all particles identical, except that here f is shown explicitly as a function of q.

In general, the particle positions are not fixed and the measurement takes place over a finite exposure time and with a macroscopic sample (much larger than the interparticle distance). The experimentally accessible intensity is thus an averaged one ⟨I(q)⟩; we need not specify whether ⟨⋅⟩ denotes a time or ensemble average. To take this into account we can rewrite Equation (3) as:

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Physics