Lably
Skip to content

Twice exceptional

Term used for a gifted student who also possesses at least one disability

  • 8 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Learning disability, Self-concept and Homeschooling

An extreme form of twice-exceptionalism is Savant syndrome. The individuals often identify with the description of twice-exceptional due to their unique combination of exceptional abilities and neurodivergent traits. The term "twice-exceptional" first appeared in James J. Gallagher's 1988 article "National Agenda for Educating Gifted Students: Statement of Priorities". Twice-exceptional individuals embody two distinct forms of exceptionalism: one being giftedness and the other including at least one aspect of neurodivergence. Giftedness is often defined in various ways and is influenced by entities ranging from local educational boards to national governments. However, one constant among every definition is that a gifted individual has high ability compared to neurotypical peers of similar age. The term neurodivergent describes an individual whose cognitive processes differ from those considered neurotypical and who possesses strengths that exceed beyond the neurotypical population. Therefore, the non-clinical designation of twice-exceptional identifies a gifted person with at least one neurodivergent trait.

Misunderstood children

Brody and Mills [1997] argue that this population of students "could be considered the most misunderstood of all exceptionalities". In each situation, the twice-exceptional student's strengths help to compensate for deficits; the deficits, on the other hand, make the child's strengths less apparent. Although, currently there is no empirical research to confirm this theory. The interplay of exceptional strengths and weaknesses in a single individual results in inconsistent performance. They might present any of the three profiles identified by educator and researcher Susan Baum:

  • Bright but not trying hard enough
  • Learning disabled but with no exceptional abilities
  • Average

In the case of behavioral/socio-emotional, rather than cognitive problems, both strengths and deficits can be intensified. A twice-exceptional student's grades commonly alternate between high and low, even within the same subject. The child might have advanced vocabulary and ideas, but be unable to organize those ideas and express them on paper. They might be a skilled artist or builder, but turn in assignments that are messy or illegible. They might complete assignments, but lose or forget to submit. To the parents and teachers observing this behavior, it may seem that the child isn't trying; many twice-exceptional children work as hard or harder than others, but with less to show for their efforts. This struggle to accomplish tasks that appear easy for other students can leave twice-exceptional children frustrated, anxious, and depressed. It can rob them of their enthusiasm and energy for school and damage their self-esteem.

Some other common situations may involve some amazing performance or contributions by such individuals being mistakenly distrusted, discredited, or undervalued because they are not known to be brilliant in other areas, or because they are far ahead of their peers in some aspects. For example, Tesla's autobiography describes his enthusiasm for solving advanced integral-calculus problems at the Austrian Polytechnic in Graz, while his biographer John J. O'Neill recounted that Tesla could perform arithmetic and algebra calculations mentally so rapidly that some teachers initially questioned whether he had obtained the answers honestly before accepting his unusual ability.

Similarly, some twice-exceptional students may not fully reveal their abilities and interests due to a learning environment which does not accommodate either their creativity or alternative ways of demonstrating knowledge. Critics of "high-functioning" and "low-functioning" labels have argued that such terminology may obscure important aspects of a given individual's abilities and support needs, since the former label may minimize the challenges experienced by individuals with relatively strong cognitive or verbal abilities, whereas the latter label may overlook the abilities and potential of individuals who require greater support.

The related disability rights and inclusive education principle of presuming competence argues that individuals should not be assumed incapable because of communication differences or support needs. Research on inclusive education interventions, such as Beyond Access, has examined approaches intended to both increase educators' perceptions of the competence of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and promote their inclusion in general education classrooms.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Psychology