Lably
Skip to content

Agriculture in ancient Greece

Part of the economy of ancient Greece

  • 17 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Agriculture, Economics and Household

Background

Written sources

Most texts in the ancient Greek language about agriculture are lost, except two botany texts by Theophrastus (Historia Plantarum or Enquiry into Plants and On the Causes of Plants, both written c. 350~287 BCE), and Hesiod's poem Works and Days (c. 700 BCE). In addition, Oeconomicus (from which book title the modern science of economics took its name), written by Xenophon around 360 BCE, is a Socratic dialogue principally about household management and agriculture.

The main texts are mostly from the Roman agronomists: Cato the Elder's De agri cultura, Columella's De re rustica, Marcus Terentius Varro and Palladius. Varro mentions at least fifty Greek authors whose works are now lost, such as the agricultural treatise Rusticatio (attributed to Mago the Carthaginian, originally written in Punic and later translated into Greek and Latin). Scholars speculate whether this text may have been an early source for agricultural traditions in the Near East and Classical world. Ancient Greek agronomy was also influenced by Babylonian agriculture through the work of 4th-century writer Vindonius Anatolius, who in turn influenced the 7th-century writer Cassianus Bassus. Bassus' Eclogae de re rustica was excerpted in the Geoponika, a surviving Byzantine text created during the reign of Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus (r. 913–959) and later translated into Arabic, Syriac and Armenian. Some additional information on agriculture in Roman Greece may be found in Pliny the Elder's encyclopaedia Natural History (77–79 CE).

Other than that, indirect evidence about the kind of food the ancient Greeks produced and traded might be inferred from mentions of dietary practices in literary texts, such as the Odyssey and Iliad, or more historical narratives such as the History of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides. Yet, using such written sources about food to hypothesise about agriculture comes with a high level of uncertainty.

Archaeological record

Aside from written sources, archaeology plays an important role in establishing facts and hypotheses around agricultural practices in ancient Greece. On the one hand, human-made tools that have been found may indicate what kinds of crops were grown, how the soil was cultivated, what kind of animal husbandry was practiced where and for what of purposes animals were kept. On the other hand, archaeobotany searches for remains of plants, charcoal, charred seeds and fruits present in stratigraphical layers of ancient settlements, and studies how their inhabitants probably used them in their lives.

For all attempts to match discoveries made by archaeobotanists with text-based sources, caution must be observed that the ancient Greek and Roman terminology used may be difficult to match with modern plant taxonomy's Greco-Latin botanical nomenclature. Kiel University archaeobotanist Helmut J. Kroll (2000) warned:

Whether a Greek plant name describes a species, a variety or a special landrace of a species is not sure. For example sesame has often been mentioned in texts since Linear B. Archaeobotanical reports of Sesamum indicum in contrast are missing or of very young date. On the other hand, there is a Bronze and Iron Age oil plant, Gold-of-pleasure or false flax Camelina sativa, of great importance in Middle Europe down to Northern Greece, which has no name in Greek literature, although Latin camelina is etymologically connected with Greek chamaelinon. Names shift from one species to another, early sesame may be Camelina sativa; in late Hellenistic times it is surely Sesamum indicum. The cooperation between botanists and classical philologists should be better, or, at best, some philologists should be hobby-botanists.

Differing ways of processing various products result in different kinds of remains that may be rediscovered and analysed. Kroll: "Hulled wheats have to be dehusked, winnowed et cetera before preparing a meal. A lot of residue is connected with these processes. The residues were often burnt and lots of charred plant remains are the result[.] So emmer and einkorn may get charred to a greater extent than bread wheat which is put into the granary and into the pot or onto the millstone without any further processing." This means that the archaeobonatical evidence is not always representative of which crops people in the past actually cultivated and consumed, and common wheat (bread wheat) is underrepresented in the archaeological record of ancient Greece. For similar reasons, common wheat (bread wheat) and durum wheat (macaroni wheat) are often difficult distinguish in practice.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Agriculture