Lably
Skip to content

Ali al-Sajjad

Great-grandson of Muhammad and fourth Shia Imam (659–713)

  • 14 min read
  • 7 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Muhammad, Medina and Umayyad Caliphate

Being politically quiescent, al-Sajjad had few followers until late in his life, as many Shia Muslims of his time were drawn to the anti-Umayyad movement of Mukhtar al-Thaqafi. Ali al-Sajjad died around 712 in Medina, either from natural causes or having been poisoned by the Umayyads. He was succeeded by his eldest son, the equally politically quiescent Muhammad al-Baqir. Some others followed al-Baqir's much younger half-brother, Zayd, whose rebellion was crushed by the Umayyads in 740, marking the birth of Zaydism. Supplications attributed to al-Sajjad are collected in Al-Sahifa al-Sajjadiyya, which is highly regarded in Shia Islam. Ali al-Sajjad is seen by Shia Muslims as an example of patience and perseverance when numerical odds are against one. He is buried in the Baqi Cemetery in Medina. The shrine that stood over his grave was demolished, along with the cemetery itself, by Wahhabis in 1806 and again in 1925.

Life

Birth and early life

Ali al-Sajjad was born in Medina, or perhaps in Kufa, in the year 38 AH (658–659). Shia Muslims annually celebrate the fifth of Sha'ban for this occasion.

Al-Sajjad was the great-grandson of Islamic prophet Muhammad, and the grandson of the first Shia imam, Ali ibn Abi Talib, by the latter's marriage with Muhammad's daughter, Fatima. After his grandfather was assassinated in 661, al-Sajjad was raised by his uncle Hasan ibn Ali and his father, Husayn ibn Ali, the second and third Shia imams, respectively. Husayn also had two other sons named Ali, both of whom were killed in the Battle of Karbala in 680. The first one was an infant, identified in Shia literature as Ali al-Asghar ibn Husayn (lit. 'Ali junior'). The second one was Ali al-Akbar ibn Husayn (lit. 'Ali senior'), although some historical accounts suggest that al-Sajjad was instead the eldest son of Husayn.

Al-Sajjad's mother is named variously in sources as Barra, Gazala, Solafa, Salama, Shahzanan, and Shahrbanu. According to Ibn Sa'd and Ibn Qutaybah, she was a freed slave girl (umm walad) from Sindh, named either Galaza or Solafa. In contrast, Shia sources, such as the 10th century Al-Kafi, maintain that al-Sajjad's mother was a daughter of Yazdegerd III (r. 632–651), the last Sasanian Emperor, who was overthrown during the Muslim conquest of Persia. Shia tradition thus refers to al-Sajjad as Ibn al-Khiyaratayn (lit. 'son of the best two'), a title that signifies his noble descent on both sides. However, the claim that al-Sajjad's mother was a Sasanian princess is specific to some Shia sources. Shia accounts add that Yazdegerd's daughter was brought to Medina as a captive during the reign of the second caliph, Umar (r. 634–644). She was then allowed to choose her husband, Husayn, and died shortly after giving birth to her only son, Ali al-Sajjad.

Karbala

On 10 Muharram 61 AH (10 October 680), Husayn and his small caravan were intercepted and massacred in Karbala, present-day Iraq, by the forces of the Umayyad Caliph Yazid I (r. 680–683), to whom Husayn had refused to pledge his allegiance. Ali al-Sajjad was also present there, in the Battle of Karbala, but was too ill to fight. After killing Husayn and his male relatives and supporters, the Umayyad troops looted his camp and some were intent on killing al-Sajjad but his life was ultimately spared.

After the battle, al-Sajjad and the women were taken prisoner and marched to the nearby Kufa. They were badly treated along the way. Once in Kufa, they were paraded in shackles, and the women unveiled, around the city, along with the heads of the fallen. The captives were then presented to the Umayyad governor Ubayd Allah ibn Ziyad, who boasted of killing Husayn and his relatives, calling it divine punishment. When al-Sajjad responded that Ibn Ziyad was a murderer, the governor ordered his execution but relented when al-Sajjad was protected by his aunt Zaynab, who asked to be killed first. Ibn Ziyad imprisoned the captives for a time and then sent them to the Umayyad capital, Damascus.

As the captives were taken to Damascus, they were displayed from village to village along the way. A letter to Yazid, attributed to Muhammad's cousin Abd Allah ibn al-Abbas, chastises the caliph for treating the captives poorly, suggesting that such treatment was worse than the massacre.

In Damascus

In Damascus, captives were paraded in the streets and then imprisoned for a while before being brought to the caliph. Yazid's reaction to, and his culpability in, the events in Karbala have been debated in medieval and modern sources alike.

The first narrative is that he treated the captives kindly after an initial, harsh interrogation, saying that he regretted the conduct of his governor, and that he would have pardoned Husayn if he were alive. Such accounts are offered by the Islamicists Laura Veccia Vaglieri, Wilferd Madelung, and Heinz Halm. In contrast, Moojan Momen, another expert, believes that Yazid, fearing social unrest, released the captives as public opinion began to sway in their favor. Similar views are expressed by some other authors, including John Esposito, R. Osman, K. Aghaie, D. Pinault, H. Munson, and the Shia scholar Muhammad Husayn Tabataba'i. In particular, the Islamicist Husain Mohammad Jafri writes that Yazid is not known to have reprimanded his governor in the wake of the massacre, which does not suggest any remorse to Jafri. At any rate, such claims of remorse are in stark contrast to Yazid's earlier orders to his governor to either exact homage from Husayn or kill him.

The alternative narrative suggests that the captives were brought to the caliph in a ceremony, who gloated over avenging his pagan relatives killed fighting Muhammad. Such accounts are given by the Islamicists Tahera Qutbuddin and R. Osman. According to some reports, Yazid also dishonored the severed head of Husayn with blows from a cane, although this last episode is sometimes attributed to Ibn Ziyad instead, in line with the Sunni tendency to exonerate the caliph of killing Husayn and blaming Ibn Ziyad. Part of the great mosque in Damascus, known as Mashhad Ali, marks where al-Sajjad was incarcerated.

The captives were eventually freed and escorted back to Medina. Their caravan may have returned via Karbala, where they halted to mourn the dead. Sunni sources report of Yazid's remorse for the massacre and that he compensated the captives for the properties plundered by his soldiers. In contrast, Shia authorities contend that it was the captives' activism that compelled the caliph to eventually distance himself from the massacre. Similar views have been expressed by some contemporary authors.

Later life

Ali al-Sajjad led a quiet and scholarly life after returning to Medina, confining himself to a small circle of followers and disciples. He kept aloof from politics and dedicated his time to prayer, which earned him his honorifics.

For many years, al-Sajjad commemorated the Karbala massacre in private gatherings, fearing the Umayyads' wrath. Such gatherings were a form of protest against the Umayyad regime, and the precursor of Shia Muharram rituals. Personally, al-Sajjad was deeply affected by the Karbala massacre, to the point that for many years he frequently wept over it. He justified his prolonged grief with a reference to the Quranic verse 12:84, which describes the immense grief of Jacob during the absence of his son Joseph.

Role in the Second Fitna

After the Karbala massacre, Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr, the son of Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, who was a prominent companion of Muhammad, declared himself caliph in the Hejaz. He gradually gained popular support, to the extent that in 683 the Kufans forcibly replaced their Umayyad governor with a representative of Ibn Zubayr. Ali al-Sajjad remained neutral towards Ibn Zubayr, even leaving town during the unrest in Medina, and never pledging allegiance to Ibn Zubayr, but being left unharmed by him. Ali al-Sajjad was also not harmed by Yazid's forces, who later pillaged Medina after their victory at the Battle of al-Harra in 683. On this occasion, al-Sajjad, unlike others, was exempted from a renewed oath of allegiance to Yazid, perhaps because he had earlier sheltered the Umayyad Marwan ibn al-Hakam and his family. Some non-Shia sources describe a friendly relationship between al-Sajjad and Marwan, who in 684 succeeded Yazid's sickly son in the caliphate. Such sources even allege that al-Sajjad borrowed from Marwan to buy a concubine or that he was consulted by him about a message from the Byzantine emperor. In contrast, Shia sources contend that al-Sajjad interacted with authorities under the principle of religious dissimulation (taqiyya) to avoid persecution.

In the wake of the Karbala massacre, the Tawwabins (lit. 'penitents') in Kufa were the first to seek revenge. They revolted to atone for having deserted Husayn, meaning to deliver the caliphate to his son, al-Sajjad; but they were crushed in 684 by a much larger Umayyad army. There is no evidence that al-Sajjad was involved in this uprising.

Shortly after Yazid's death in 683, Mukhtar al-Thaqafi appeared in Kufa, where he campaigned to avenge Husayn, while claiming to represent Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyya, who was a son of Ali ibn Abi Talib, but not from the latter's marriage to Fatima. By some accounts, Mukhtar initially sought the support of al-Sajjad, who refused. Mukhtar's campaign in Kufa was nevertheless successful, and he seized control of the city in 686, whereupon he killed some of those thought to be responsible for the Karbala massacre, including Shimr, Ibn Sa'd, and Ibn Ziyad. Mukhtar may have even made a gift of Ibn Sa'd's head to al-Sajjad. When Mukhtar was himself killed by Ibn Zubayr's forces in 687, they did not harm al-Sajjad, which suggests that al-Sajjad had only weak ties to Mukhtar. Sources are contradictory as to what al-Sajjad thought of Mukhtar, although Shia sources are largely unsympathetic towards Mukhtar, in part because he championed Ibn al-Hanafiyya rather than al-Sajjad. Similarly, al-Sajjad was not harmed by the Umayyad commander Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, who defeated and killed Ibn Zubayr in 692.

Sign in to keep reading

6 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Religious figures