Lably
Skip to content

Chow group

Analogs of homology groups for algebraic varieties

  • 11 min read
  • 9 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Linear combination, Integer and Natural number

Rational equivalence and Chow groups

For what follows, define a variety over a field k to be an integral scheme of finite type over k. For any scheme X of finite type over k, an algebraic cycle on X means a finite linear combination of subvarieties of X with integer coefficients. (Here and below, subvarieties are understood to be closed in X, unless stated otherwise.) For a natural number i, the group Zi(X) of i-dimensional cycles (or i-cycles, for short) on X is the free abelian group on the set of i-dimensional subvarieties of X.

For a variety W of dimension i+1 and any rational function f on W which is not identically zero, the divisor of f is the i-cycle

(f)=∑ZordZ⁡(f)Z,

where the sum runs over all i-dimensional subvarieties Z of W and the integer ordZ⁡(f) denotes the order of vanishing of f along Z. (Thus ordZ⁡(f) is negative if f has a pole along Z.) The definition of the order of vanishing requires some care for W singular.

For a scheme X of finite type over k, the group of i-cycles rationally equivalent to zero is the subgroup of Zi(X) generated by the cycles (f) for all (i+1)-dimensional subvarieties W of X and all nonzero rational functions f on W. The Chow group CHi(X) of i-dimensional cycles on X is the quotient group of Zi(X) by the subgroup of cycles rationally equivalent to zero. Sometimes one writes [Z] for the class of a subvariety Z in the Chow group, and if two subvarieties Z and W have [Z]=[W], then Z and W are said to be rationally equivalent.

For example, when X is a variety of dimension n, the Chow group CHn−1(X) is the divisor class group of X. When X is smooth over k (or more generally, a locally Noetherian normal factorial scheme ), this is isomorphic to the Picard group of line bundles on X.

Examples of Rational Equivalence

Rational Equivalence on Projective Space

Rationally equivalent cycles defined by hypersurfaces are easy to construct on projective space because they can all be constructed as the vanishing loci of the same vector bundle. For example, given two homogeneous polynomials of degree d, so f,g∈H0(Pn,O(d)), we can construct a family of hypersurfaces defined as the vanishing locus of sf+tg. Schematically, this can be constructed as

X=Proj(C[s,t][x0,…,xn](sf+tg))↪P1×Pn

using the projection π1:X→P1 we can see the fiber over a point [s0:t0] is the projective hypersurface defined by s0f+t0g. This can be used to show that the cycle class of every hypersurface of degree d is rationally equivalent to d[Pn−1], since sf+tx0d can be used to establish a rational equivalence. Notice that the locus of x0d=0 is Pn−1 and it has multiplicity d, which is the coefficient of its cycle class.

Rational Equivalence of Cycles on a Curve

If we take two distinct line bundles L,L′∈Pic⁡(C) of a smooth projective curve C, then the vanishing loci of a generic section of both line bundles defines non-equivalent cycle classes in CH(C). This is because Div⁡(C)≅Pic⁡(C) for smooth varieties, so the divisor classes of s∈H0(C,L) and s′∈H0(C,L′) define inequivalent classes.

Sign in to keep reading

8 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Topics in mathematics