Lably
Skip to content

Electric vehicle warning sounds

Safety feature

  • 23 min read
  • 5 chapters

Learn it on Lably

Japan issued guidelines for such warning devices in January 2010, and the US approved legislation in December 2010. The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued its final ruling in February 2018. Their ruling requires vehicles to emit warning sounds at speeds below 18.6 mph (30 km/h), with full compliance by September 2020 and 50% of "quiet" vehicles compliant by September 2019. In April 2014, the European Parliament approved legislation that requires the mandatory use of an acoustic vehicle alerting system (AVAS). Manufacturers must install an AVAS in four-wheeled electric and hybrid electric vehicles that are approved from July 1, 2019, and in all new quiet electric and hybrid vehicles registered from July 2021. The vehicle must make a continuous noise level of at least 56 dBA (within 7 feet or 2 metres) if the car is going 12 mph (20 km/h) or slower, and a maximum of 75 dBA.

Several automakers have developed electric warning sound devices, and since December 2011 advanced technology cars available in the market with manually activated electric warning sounds include the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, Honda FCX Clarity, Nissan Fuga Hybrid/Infiniti M35, Hyundai Sonata Hybrid, and the Toyota Prius (Japan only). Models equipped with automatically activated systems include the 2014 BMW i3 (option not available in the US), 2012 model year Toyota Camry Hybrid, 2012 Lexus CT200h, all EV versions of the Honda Fit, and all Prius family cars recently introduced in the United States, including the standard 2012 model year Prius, the Toyota Prius v, Prius c and the Toyota Prius Plug-in Hybrid. The 2013 Smart electric drive, optionally, comes with automatically activated sounds in the US and Japan and manually activated in Europe.

Background

As a result of increased sales of full electric vehicle and hybrid electric vehicles in several countries, some members of the blind community have raised concerns about the reduced noise when these vehicles operate in all-electric mode, since they rely on the sound of combustion engines as an aid when crossing streets and consider quiet hybrids a potential hazard. Although a 2009 study found no statistically significant difference in pedestrian crashes involving quiet hybrid vehicles when compared to noisier vehicles when both types of vehicles were travelling in a straight line, it found a 2x increase of pedestrian crashes involving hybrid vehicles when reversing, parking, and similar slow maneuvers.

This problem is not exclusive to electric vehicles. In 2007, research at the Technical University of Munich showed that ordinary vehicles in background noise are often detected too late for safe accident avoidance. The researchers measured the distance at which vehicles approaching pedestrians became audible with minimal background noise. These distances were then compared to the stopping distances of the respective cars, and an algorithm was proposed to estimate them based on auditory masking.

Research conducted at the University of California, Riverside in 2008 found that hybrid cars are so quiet when operating in electric mode (EV mode) that they may pose a risk to pedestrians and cyclists, especially the blind, children and the elderly, as they may have only one or two seconds, depending on the context, to audibly detect the location of approaching hybrid cars when the vehicles operate at very slow speeds. This research project was funded by the National Federation of the Blind.

The experiment consisted of making audio recordings of a Toyota Prius and combustion engine Honda Accord approaching from two directions at 5 miles per hour (8.0 km/h) to ensure that the hybrid car operated only with its electric motor. Then, test subjects in a laboratory listened to the recordings and indicated when they could hear from which direction the cars approached. Subjects could locate the hum of the internal combustion engine car at 36 feet (11 m) away but could not identify the hybrid running in electric mode until it came within 11 feet (3.4 m), leaving just under two seconds to react before the vehicle reached their position. In a second trial, the background sounds of two quietly idling combustion engine cars were added to the recordings to simulate the noise of a parking lot. Under this condition, the hybrid needed to be 74 percent closer than the conventional car before the subjects could hear from which direction the cars approached. Subjects could correctly judge the approach of the combustion car when it was about 28 feet (8.5 m) away. This means that under more realistic environmental noise, a pedestrian would not detect the hybrid's approach until it was one second away.

A separate 2008 study from Western Michigan University found that hybrids and conventional vehicles are equally safe when travelling more than about 20 miles per hour (32 km/h), because tire and wind noise generate most of the audible cues at those speeds. Hybrid cars were also tested safe when moving off at traffic lights, and it was found that under this condition they do not pose a risk to pedestrians. All Prius models used in the study engaged their internal combustion engines when accelerating from a standstill and produced enough noise to be detected.

A 2009 study conducted by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists have higher incidence rates for hybrid electric vehicles than internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles in low-speed vehicle maneuvers such as reversing or leaving a parking zone. These accidents commonly occurred in zones with low-speed limits, during daytime, and in clear weather. The study found that a HEV was twice as likely to be involved in a pedestrian crash than was a conventional ICE vehicle when a vehicle is slowing or stopping, backing up, or entering or leaving a parking space. Manoeuvres likely to occur at very low speeds, where the difference in sound levels between hybrid and ICE vehicle is greatest, were grouped into a single category. Also, the study found that the incidence rate of pedestrian crashes in scenarios when vehicles make a turn was significantly higher for HEVs when compared to ICE vehicles. Similarly, The NHTSA study also concluded that the incidence rate of bicyclist crashes involving HEVs for the same kind of manoeuvres was significantly higher when compared to conventional vehicles.

In September 2010, Volvo Cars and Vattenfall, a Swedish energy company, issued a report regarding the results of the first phase of the Volvo V70 Plug-in Hybrid demonstration program. Among other findings, before the trial, drivers in the field test were concerned that the quietness of the electric-drive vehicle made them a danger to pedestrians and cyclists. After the test, several of them changed their opinion and said that this issue was less of a problem than they expected. Nevertheless, some test drivers said they experienced incidents of not being noticed, while others said they had taken extra care in their driving with regard to this issue.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Science