Lably
Skip to content

Euglena

Genus of unicellular flagellate eukaryotes

  • 9 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Chloroplast, Protist and Peptide

The species Euglena gracilis has been used extensively in the laboratory as a model organism.

Most species of Euglena have photosynthesizing chloroplasts within the body of the cell, which enable them to feed by autotrophy, like plants. However, they can also take nourishment heterotrophically, like animals. Since Euglena have features of both animals and plants, early taxonomists, working within the Linnaean two-kingdom system of biological classification, found them difficult to classify. It was the question of where to put such "unclassifiable creatures" that prompted Ernst Haeckel to add a third living kingdom (a fourth kingdom in toto) to the Animale, Vegetabile (and Lapideum meaning Mineral) of Linnaeus: the Kingdom Protista.

History of knowledge

Early observations

Species of Euglena were among the first protists to be seen under the microscope. In 1674, in a letter to the Royal Society, the Dutch pioneer of microscopy Antonie van Leeuwenhoek wrote that he had collected water samples from an inland lake, in which he found "animalcules" that were "green in the middle, and before and behind white." Clifford Dobell regards it as "almost certain" that these were Euglena viridis, whose "peculiar arrangement of chromatophores...gives the flagellate this appearance at low magnification." Twenty two years later, John Harris published a brief series of "Microscopical Observations" reporting that he had examined "a small Drop of the Green Surface of some Puddle-Water" and found it to be "altogether composed of Animals of several Shapes and Magnitudes." Among them, were "oval creatures whose middle part was of a Grass Green, but each end Clear and Transparent," which "would contract and dilate themselves, tumble over and over many times together, and then shoot away like Fish."

In 1786, O.F. Müller gave a more complete description of the organism, which he named Cercaria viridis, noting its distinctive color and changeable body shape. Müller also provided a series of illustrations, accurately depicting the undulating, contractile movements (metaboly) of the cell body. In 1830, C. G. Ehrenberg renamed Müller's Cercaria Euglena viridis, and placed it, in keeping with the short-lived system of classification he invented, among the Polygastrica in the family Astasiaea: multi-stomached "creatures" with no alimentary canal, variable body shape but no pseudopods or lorica. By making use of the newly invented achromatic microscope, Ehrenberg was able to see Euglena's eyespot, which he correctly identified as a "rudimentary eye" (although he reasoned, wrongly, that this meant the "creature" also had a nervous system). This feature was incorporated into Ehrenberg's name for the new genus, constructed from the Greek roots "eu-" (well, good) and glēnē (eyeball, socket of joint).

Ehrenberg did not notice Euglena's flagella, however. The first to publish a record of this feature was Félix Dujardin, who added "filament flagelliforme" to the descriptive criteria of the genus in 1841. Subsequently, the class Flagellata (Cohn, 1853) was created for "creatures", like Euglena, possessing one or more flagella. While "Flagellata" has fallen from use as a taxon, the notion of using flagella as a phylogenetic criterion remains vigorous.

Recent classification

In 1881, Georg Klebs made a primary taxonomic distinction between green and colorless flagellate organisms, separating photosynthetic from heterotrophic euglenoids. The latter (largely colorless, shape-changing uniflagellates) were divided among the Astasiaceae and the Peranemaceae, while flexible green euglenoids were generally assigned to the genus Euglena.

As early as 1935, it was recognized that this was an artificial grouping, however convenient. In 1948, Pringsheim affirmed that the distinction between green and colorless flagellates had little taxonomic justification, although he acknowledged its practical appeal. He proposed something of a compromise, placing colorless, saprotrophic euglenoids in the genus Astasia, while allowing some colorless euglenoids to share a genus with their photosynthesizing cousins, provided they had structural features that proved common ancestry. Among the green euglenoids themselves, Pringsheim recognized the close kinship of some species of Phacus and Lepocinclis with some species of Euglena.

By the 1950s, when A. Hollande published a major revision of the phylum, organisms were classified by shared structural features, such as the number and type of flagella. In the 1970s, it was hypothesized that photosynthetic euglenoids derived their chloroplasts by engulfing an algal cell and took its photosynthetic machinery. This secondary endosymbiosis hypothesis was later confirmed through molecular evidence, and it appears that the photosynthetic euglenoids are grouped into one clade. However, genetic analysis of the non-photosynthesizing euglenoid Astasia longa confirmed that this organism retains sequences of DNA inherited from an ancestor that must have had functioning chloroplasts; therefore, some once-photosynthetic lineages must have later lost the chloroplasts. Recognizing the non-monophyletic nature of the genus Euglena, Marin et al. (2003) have revised it to include certain members traditionally placed in Astasia and Khawkinea.

Throughout its taxonomic history, Euglena served as a "holding bag" for species that did not morphologically fit into other groups. This made Euglena a heterogeneous assemblage, and made correct species identification very difficult. Some researchers proposed intra-generic groups within Euglena; for example Pringsheim (1956) named five groups (Rigidae, Lentiferae, Catilliferae, Radiatae, Serpentes) based on cell shape and chloroplast morphology, while Zakryś (1986) named three subgenera (Euglena, Calliglena and Discoglena) based on chloroplast and paramylon morphology. However, molecular phylogenetics once again showed that these groups did not always correspond to evolutionary lineages. To revise this, taxonomists have transferred species out of Euglena and into other genera, including Lepocinclis, Phacus, and the newly proposed genera Discoplastis, Euglenaria, and Euglenaformis.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Organisms