Lably
Skip to content

Fall of Maximilien Robespierre

1794 event during the French Revolution

  • 11 min read
  • 3 chapters

Related on Lably

Through French Revolution and Purge

On the following day, this tension in the Convention allowed Jean-Lambert Tallien, one of the conspirators whom Robespierre had in mind in his denunciation, to turn the Convention against Robespierre and demand his arrest. By the end of 28 July, Robespierre was executed by guillotine on the Place de la Révolution. Robespierre's fall led to the implementation of more moderate policies during the Thermidorian Reaction, which soon followed.

Background

Purge of the Hébertists and Dantonists

On 27 July 1793, Robespierre was elected to the Committee of Public Safety and would remain a member until his death. Between September 1793 and July 1794, the Committee's power increased dramatically through several measures instated during the Reign of Terror, such as the Law of Suspects and the Law of 14th Frimaire, becoming the de facto executive branch of the revolutionary government, under the supervision of the National Convention.

During this time, two different factions rose in opposition to the restructured revolutionary government: the left-wing ultra-revolutionaries and the moderate right-wing citra-revolutionaries. The left (known as Hébertists or exagérés) gathered around Jacques Hébert, as well as leaders of the Paris Commune and the exagérés of the Cordeliers Club. They pushed for stronger repression measures than those already in place during the Terror and campaigned for dechristianization. The right (known as Dantonists or Indulgents) formed around Georges Danton as well as the indulgents members of the Cordeliers Club, including Camille Desmoulins. They were strongly opposed to the machinery of the Terror and policies of the Committee of Public Safety. Both these factions were charged as conspirators against the revolutionary government and sentenced to the guillotine: the Hébertists on 24 March (4 Germinal) and the Dantonists on 5 April (16 Germinal).

With these purges, the power of the Committee was reaffirmed. However, the deaths of Danton and Desmoulins, both formerly friends of Robespierre, left a deep toll on him. This, combined with the increasing demands of both the Committee on Public Safety and the National Convention, washed away Robespierre's mental and physical health to the point he was forced to reduce his presence in the Jacobin Club and the National Convention.

Division within the revolutionary government

Robespierre did not reappear in the National Convention until 7 May (18 Floréal). For this day he had planned a speech addressing the relationship between religion, morality, and the republican principles; and to establish the Cult of the Supreme Being in place of the Cult of Reason promoted by de-Christianizers like the Hébertists. On 21 May 1794 the revolutionary government decided that the Terror would be centralised, with almost all the tribunals in the provinces closed and all the trials held in Paris.

Robespierre led the processions during the Festival in Honor of the Supreme Being celebrated on 8 June (20 Prairial). Although the festival was well accepted by the crowds, Robespierre's prominent position in it was suspicious in the eyes of some deputies, and muttering began about Robespierre's fanaticism and desire for power. Two days after the festival, Robespierre pushed the National Convention to pass the Law of 22 Prairial drafted by him and Georges Couthon, which accelerated the trial process and extended the death penalty to include a new set of "enemies of the people"; this included those seeking to reestablish the monarchy, interfering with food provisions, discrediting the National Convention, and communicating with foreigners, among others. The fear of assassination drove Robespierre to take this measure: two assassination attempts against Robespierre and Collot d'Herbois had taken place on 23 and 24 May (4–5 Prairial), and the memory of Lepeletier's and Jean-Paul Marat's murders still roused feelings in the Convention. The law was not universally accepted in the Convention, and critics of Robespierre and Louis Antoine de Saint-Just would use it against them during the events of 9 Thermidor.

More opposition came from the Committee of General Security, which had not been consulted over the contents of the law. The Committee of General Security already felt threatened by the Committee of Public Safety's new ability to issue arrest warrants, as well as by the Police Bureau, which had been created by Saint-Just and was being run by Robespierre in his absence, and whose functions overlapped with that of the Committee of General Security. As payment, they presented a report on the ties between the English enemy and the self-proclaimed "Mother of God", Catherine Théot, who had prophesied that Robespierre was a new Messiah. This was done both with the intention of diminishing Robespierre, and to mock his religious positions and the Cult of The Supreme Being.

On 28 June (10 Messidor) Saint-Just returned from the northern front bearing news: the Revolutionary Army had defeated the Austrian army in Belgium at the Battle of Fleurus, securing the road to Paris. This victory signaled the end of the war against the Austrians, and with it, the end of the Terror government. Robespierre, wishing to get rid of both internal and external enemies, objected to the disbandment of the war government. The following day, in a joint meeting of the Committees of Public Safety and General Security, Lazare Carnot allegedly shouted at Saint-Just that both he and Robespierre were "ridiculous dictators". Following this event, Robespierre stopped participating directly in the deliberations of the Committee of Public Safety.

Having abandoned both the Committee and the National Convention, which he stopped frequenting after his presidency ended on 18 June (30 Prairial), Robespierre's absence allowed the breach between him and other members of the revolutionary government to widen. He did not reappear until 23 July (5 Thermidor), when he sat for another joint convention of the two Committees put forward in a failed attempt to resolve their mutual differences.

Sign in to keep reading

2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Early modern