Lably
Skip to content

Foreign policy of the Lyndon B. Johnson administration

Foreign of policy of the lyndon b. johnson administration

  • 18 min read
  • 8 chapters
Photo portrait of President Lyndon B. Johnson in the Oval Office, leaning on a chair.
Arnold Newman · Public domain

Related on Lably

Through Cold War, Soviet Union and Détente

The U.S. had stationed advisory military personnel in South Vietnam since the 1950s, but Johnson presided over a major escalation of the U.S. role in the Vietnam War. After the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, he obtained congressional approval to use military force to repel future attacks by North Vietnam. The number of U.S. soldiers increased from 16,700 soldiers when Johnson took office to over 500,000 in 1968, but North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces continued fighting despite losses. Domestic resistance to the war grew throughout Johnson's presidency, and especially after the 1968 Tet Offensive. Johnson was unsuccessful in his efforts to reach a peace agreement during his final days in office, and the war continued.

Johnson pursued conciliatory policies with the Soviet Union, but stopping well short of the détente policy Richard Nixon introduced in the 1970s. He was instead committed to the traditional policy of containment, seeking to stop the spread of Communism in Southeast Asia and elsewhere. He continued Kennedy's Alliance for Progress policies in Latin America and successfully pressured Israel to accept a cease fire in the Six-Day War.

Policy making

Appointments

President Lyndon B. Johnson's key foreign policy advisors were Dean Rusk, George Ball, McGeorge Bundy, Walt Rostow, Robert McNamara and Clark Clifford. According to historian David Fromkin:

Johnson was not a "hidden hand" president like Eisenhower, who appeared to let his cabinet make policy while in fact doing so him self. L.B.J. was what he seemed at the time: a president ill at ease in foreign policy who chose to rely on the judgment of the Kennedy team he inherited....When his advisers disagreed, would try to split the difference between them. He acted as a majority leader, reconciling diverse points of view within his own camp rather than making decisions on the merits of the issue. He wanted to quell dissent, and he was a master at it.

All historians agree that Vietnam dominated the administration's foreign policy and all agree the policy was a political disaster on the home front. Most agree that it was a diplomatic disaster, although some say that it was successful in avoiding the loss of more allies. Unexpectedly, North Vietnam after it conquered the South became a major adversary of China, stopping China's expansion to the south in the way that Washington had hoped in vain that South Vietnam would do. In other areas the achievements were limited. Historian Jonathan Colman says that was because Vietnam dominated the attention; the USSR was gaining military parity; Washington's allies more becoming more independent (e.g. France) or were getting weaker (Britain); and the American economy was unable to meet Johnson's demands that it supply both guns and butter.

Former White House staff and historian, Doris Kearns Goodwin, wrote about Johnson feeling conflicted in his foreign policy. She recounts Johnson saying he would be "crucified" in any action he took, whether it being too hard or too soft on Communism. As a senator, he saw the political lessons after the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949. Johnson understood the pressure to not appear 'weak' in opposing Communism in Vietnam. There were ideas of masculinity and manhood among Johnson and his advisors that drove his foreign policy and the decision behind escalating the Vietnam War, which they were not confident they could win. There was the belief that the American public would forgive the President for anything, except for "being weak". This was important for managing America's post-colonial empire.

Sign in to keep reading

7 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in History