Lably
Skip to content

Human shield

Non-combatants placed around a target to discourage enemy attacks

  • 22 min read
  • 3 chapters
Human shield - S. Solomko.jpg
Sergey Solomko · Public domain

Related on Lably

Through Mahatma Gandhi, Ancient history and Fascist Italy

A human shield is a non-combatant (or a group of non-combatants) who either volunteers or is forced to shield a legitimate military target in order to deter the enemy from attacking it. Forcing protected persons to serve as human shields is a war crime according to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, and the 1998 Rome Statute. The term is also used when combatants place themselves in or conduct military activity from locations with non-combatants nearby, making it difficult for the enemy to attack without endangering the non-combatants.

Under Article 28 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, it is prohibited to use civilians to render military objectives immune from attack. This prohibition includes human shields under customary international law and Article 51(7) of the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions. The law specifically holds that medical units shall not be used in an attempt to shield military objectives from attack. Using civilians as human shields may constitute a war crime. But even in the case of a breach of international humanitarian law by one party, all parties remain bound by their IHL obligations.

According to law professor Eliav Lieblich, "Armed groups might be responsible for harm that they occasion to civilians under their control. But to argue that this absolves the other party from responsibility is to get both law and morality wrong."

Law professor Adil Ahmad Haque states that involuntary shields "retain their legal and moral protection from intentional, unnecessary, and disproportionate harm". He argues against the position of the United States Department of Defense (as well as the United Kingdom and some scholars) that attackers may discount or disregard collateral harm in determining proportionality and states that these views are "legally baseless and morally unsound".

Authors Neve Gordon and Nicola Perugini, elaborating on their book, Human Shields: A History of People in the Line of Fire, discuss "proximate shields", humans as shields merely due to proximity to belligerents and assert that this type has become "by far the most prominent type of shield in contemporary discourse". They say that the proximate shielding accusation has been used by states to cover-up war crimes against civilian populations and that human rights organizations frequently fail to question this charge which they claim is being improperly used to justify civilian deaths.

Sign in to keep reading

2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Politics and economics