Lably
Skip to content

LGBTQ movements

Social identity movements

  • 39 min read
  • 4 chapters
Outside of the official business district, the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar on Christopher Street in Manhattan's Greenwich Village. A 1969 police raid here led to the Stonewall riots , one of the most imp
Rhododendrites · CC BY-SA 4.0

Related on Lably

Through Social movement, Discrimination and Sociology

While there is no overarching organization representing all LGBTQ people, numerous advocacy groups, grassroots networks, and community-based organizations work to advance related causes. The earliest known LGBTQ rights organization was the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee, founded in Berlin in 1897.

The common goal of LGBTQ movements is equal rights for LGBTQ people. Specific goals include the decriminalization of homosexuality, legal recognition of same-sex relationships, protections against discrimination, and access to gender-affirming healthcare. Some branches of these movements also emphasize cultural visibility, community-building, and liberation from societal systems seen as oppressive, such as heteronormativity and cisnormativity.

Modern LGBTQ movements encompass a wide range of strategies, including political lobbying, street marches and protests, mutual aid, academic research, and artistic expression. These movements are internally diverse, with ongoing debates over tactics, identity, inclusion, and the intersections of gender, sexuality, race, and class.

Overview

Sociologist Mary Bernstein writes:

For the lesbian and gay movement, then, cultural goals include (but are not limited to) challenging dominant constructions of masculinity and femininity, homophobia, and the primacy of the gendered heterosexual nuclear family (heteronormativity). Political goals include changing laws and policies to gain new rights, benefits, and protections from harm.

Bernstein emphasizes that LGBTQ activists often pursue both cultural and political goals across the civil and legal spheres.

Like other social movements, LGBTQ movements experience internal conflict over strategy, representation, and direction—particularly regarding education reform and who speaks for the broader community. There is ongoing debate over how much common ground exists among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and other queer individuals, and whether they should pursue shared political goals.

In the 1970s through the 1990s, leaders of the lesbian and gay rights movement sometimes downplayed or excluded masculine lesbians, feminine gay men, transgender people, and bisexuals, creating rifts within LGBTQ communities. Research by Roffee and Waling (2016) found that LGBTQ individuals often face microaggressions and exclusionary behaviors from others within their own community. These tensions stem from misconceptions and differing beliefs about what constitutes LGBTQ identity.

For example, transgender individuals have reported that other LGBTQ members may dismiss or misunderstand their specific needs, leading to harmful assumptions and potential health risks. Similarly, bisexual people have often felt that their identities are invalidated by both straight and gay communities. Even when individuals align with the broader values of LGBTQ advocacy, inconsistencies and internal prejudice can persist.

Many LGBTQ movements have adopted forms of identity politics that position gay, bisexual, and transgender people as fixed minority groups. This approach has helped secure rights and visibility, but it has also drawn criticism from within the community. Critics within the queer movement argue that fixed categories such as gay and lesbian are restrictive and fail to reflect the fluidity of sexuality and gender. These categories, they suggest, "reinforce rather than challenge a cultural system that always marks non-heterosexual identities as inferior."

Despite differences in approach, many activists share liberal political goals of equality and freedom, seeking to integrate into the political mainstream alongside other marginalized groups. LGBTQ movements widely oppose "conversion therapy" efforts to change sexual orientation or gender identity, emphasizing that these traits are innate and immutable. Such practices are often rooted in religious doctrines that view non-heterosexual activity as immoral. While religious institutions have historically condemned LGBTQ identities, opposition has never been universal. Attitudes vary widely between denominations, cultures, and eras.

Today, numerous religious communities and individual believers openly support LGBTQ rights.

Historically, anticlerical sentiment in Catholic countries after the French Revolution—combined with the liberalizing effects of the Napoleonic Code—led to the repeal of sodomy laws in many areas. In contrast, Protestant countries, where church authority was less centralized, often retained religiously inspired statutes well into the 20th century. Some laws persist even today; for example, a 2008 court case in India was based on a 150-year-old colonial-era law criminalizing sodomy.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Social studies