Lably
Skip to content

Merycoidodontoidea

Extinct superfamily of mammals

  • 5 min read
  • 4 chapters
Merycoidodon culbertsoni skeleton (AMNH 1287) on display at the American Museum of Natural History.
Jonathan Chen · CC BY-SA 4.0

Related on Lably

Through Prehistory, Molar (tooth) and Herbivore

Most merycoidodontoids were sheep-sized, though some genera grew to the size of cattle. They were heavy-bodied, with short four-toed hooves and comparatively long tails. Nearly all merycoidodontoids were terrestrial short-toed mammals belonging to the highly diverse family Merycoidodontidae. A few species belong to another family, Agriochoeridae, which retain particularly long tails and claws, potentially useful for climbing trees.

In life, the animals would have looked rather pig- or sheep-like, but features of their teeth indicate they were more closely related to camelids. They were most likely woodland and grassland browsers. They were among the most abundant and widespread large herbivorous mammals in North America during the Oligocene and Miocene epochs. Later forms diversified to suit a range of different habitats. For example, Promerycochoerus had adaptations suggesting a semiamphibious lifestyle, similar to that of modern hippos.

Taxonomy

Merycoidodontoidea is divided into two families: the Merycoidodontidae (originally known as Oreodontidae) which contains all of the derived taxa, and the Agriochoeridae, which contains the smaller and more basal taxa. Together they form the now-extinct suborder Oreodonta. Oreodonts may have been distantly related to pigs, hippopotamuses, and the pig-like peccaries. Indeed, some scholars place Merycoidodontidae within the pig-related suborder Suina (Suiformes). Other scholars place oreodonts closer to camels in the suborder Tylopoda. Still, other experts put the oreodonts together with the short-lived cainotheres in the taxonomic suborder Ancodonta comprising these two groups of extinct ancodonts. All scholars agree, however, that the oreodont was an early form of even-toed ungulate, belonging to the order Artiodactyla. Today, most evidence points towards the oreodonts being tylopods, along with camels, xiphodonts, and protoceratids.

Over 50 genera of Oreodonta have been described in the paleozoological literature. However, oreodonts are widely considered to be taxonomically oversplit, and many of these genera may prove to be synonymous. The last researchers to fully review oreodont taxonomy were C. Bertrand Schultz and Charles H. Falkenbach in the 1960s. Their work has been criticized for erecting excessive numbers of genera, based in part on apparent anatomical differences between different specimens that were actually taphonomic deformations due to postburial forces. Undeformed skulls would be placed in one genus, while skulls crushed from side to side would be placed in a second genus and skulls crushed from front to back would be placed in a third genus. Researchers are beginning to restudy oreodonts and synonymize many genera, but as of 2004 only a few groups had been reviewed.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Animals