Lably
Skip to content

Nadir of American race relations

Late 19th-/early 20th-century period of US history

  • 14 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through American Civil War and Civilization

Historians differ on the period's date range. Logan's 1954 book The Negro in American Life and Thought defines "The Nadir, 1877–1901" when "the Negro's status in American society" fell lowest, arguing for 1901 as the turning point when race relations started to improve. Others, such as John Hope Franklin and Henry Arthur Callis, argue for ending dates as late as 1923. James W. Loewen (2006) argues for a later starting date, seeing the post-Reconstruction era as one of widespread hope for racial equity due to idealistic Northern support for civil rights. In Loewen's view, the true nadir only began when Northern Republicans ceased supporting Southern black people's rights around 1890, and it lasted until the American entry into World War II in 1941.

Logan's focus was exclusively on African Americans in the Southern United States, but the period also represents the worst of anti-Chinese and anti-Asian discrimination, when fear of the so-called Yellow Peril incited harassment and violence on the West Coast and the destruction of Denver's Chinatown.

Background

Reconstruction revisionism

In the early 20th century, a group of white historians claimed that Reconstruction was a tragic period for the South, when Northern Republicans motivated by revenge and profit used federal troops to force the defeated Southerners to accept corrupt governments run by unscrupulous Northerners and feckless black people. Such scholars generally dismissed the idea that black people could ever be capable of self-government.

Proponents of this view became known as the Dunning School, after William Archibald Dunning (1857 – 1922) of Columbia University. Another Columbia professor, John Burgess, was notorious for writing that "black skin means membership in a race of men which has never of itself ... created any civilization of any kind."

The Dunning School's view of Reconstruction held sway for decades. Its views were dramatized in D. W. Griffith's popular movie The Birth of a Nation (1915) and to some extent in Margaret Mitchell's novel Gone with the Wind (1936). More recent historians have decisively rejected many of the Dunning School's conclusions.

History of Reconstruction

Today's consensus regards Reconstruction as a time of idealism and hope which resulted in some practical achievements. The Radical Republicans who passed the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments were, for the most part, motivated by a desire to help freedmen. African American historian W. E. B. Du Bois put forth this view in 1910, and later historians Kenneth Stampp and Eric Foner furthered it. The Republican Reconstruction governments had their share of malfeasance, but they benefited many whites as well as blacks, and were no more corrupt than other governments of the day, Democratic as well as Northern Republican.

Reconstruction governments established public education and social welfare institutions for the first time, improving education for both black and white people, and they tried to improve social conditions for the many left in poverty after the long war. No Reconstruction state government was dominated by black people; in fact, black people did not attain a level of representation that was equal to the size of their population in any state.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Modern