Lably
Skip to content

Parhae

7th-10th century kingdom in East Asia

  • 57 min read
  • 10 chapters
The territory of Balhae, In 830s during the reign of king Seon of Balhae. Territory of Balhae in 830..
Historiographer at English Wikipedia · Public domain

Related on Lably

Through Korea

There are differing accounts of Parhae's founding, but most of them state that when Parhae was founded by Tae Choyŏng in 698, it involved Goguryeo and Mohe people. Parhae's early history was marked by a rocky relationship with the Tang dynasty, characterized by military and political conflict, but by the end of the 8th century the relationship had become cordial and friendly. The Tang dynasty would eventually recognize Parhae as the "Prosperous Country in the East".

Parhae's culture has been described as similar to, derived from, or affiliated with Goguryeo, Mohe, Khitan, and Tang cultural elements. However the exact nature of Parhae's relationship to these cultures is disputed. Parhae adopted some of the Tang's administrative systems like Three Departments and Six Ministries. Parhae was conquered by the Khitan-led Liao dynasty in 926. A significant portion of Parhae's population fled to Goryeo while others remained in Parhae or were deported to other places in the Liao empire. Parhae survived as a distinct population group for another three centuries in the Liao and Jin dynasties before assimilating into other groups and disappearing under Mongol rule.

The history surrounding the origin of the state, its ethnic composition, the modern cultural affiliation of the ruling dynasty, the reading of their names, and its borders are the subject of a historiographical dispute between Korea, China and Russia. Historical sources from both China and Korea have described Parhae's founder, Tae Choyŏng, as related to the Mohe people and Goguryeo.

Name

Parhae was founded in 698 by Tae Choyŏng (Da Zuorong) under the name 震 (진, Jin), read as tsyinH in Middle Chinese. The kingdom's name was transcribed as 振 in Chinese, with the same Middle Chinese reading as 震. This name is presumed to derive from the 'Jin' (震) trigram of the I Ching, which means thunder, movement, change, and corresponds with the East.

In 713, the Tang dynasty bestowed the ruler of Jin with the noble title "Prince of Commandery of Bohai (Parhae)" (渤海郡王). In 762, the Tang formally elevated Parhae to the status of a kingdom. The kingdom's territories did not overlap with the Bohai Commandery. According to the New Book of Tang, the state was referred to as Mohe (靺鞨, Kr. Malgal, name of the ethnic group) before receiving investiture from the Tang in 713 and assuming the name Bohai (Parhae). Historian Jin Yufu also argued that the Tang referred to the state as Mohe until that time and that "Parhae" may have been another transcription of the same name. Linguists Karl Heinrich Menges and Roy Andrew Miller raised another theory, suggesting that the name Parhae had an underlying native name which was cognate to Manchu butha ("hunting").

The transcriptions Bohai (Chinese pinyin romanization), Po-hai (Chinese Wade–Giles romanization), and Balhae (Revised Romanization of Korean) are also used in modern academia. Most Western-language scholarship have opted for Bohai except in the field of Korean studies; however, some scholars have chosen the Korean romanization to avoid a "Chinese" narrative spread by the usage of pinyin romanization. According to Pamela Kyle Crossley, neither Chinese or Korean transliterations can be correct. She chose to use modern Chinese transliteration "to indicate that the only referent we have is Chinese characters". Jonghyun Jee, Byungjun Kim, and Bong Gwan Jun concur with Crossley, noting that no historical accounts provide information on Parhae's pronunciation, and neither modern Chinese or Korean readings accurately represent the pronunciation at the time. The choice of transliteration for 渤海 as "Balhae" or "Bohai" therefore "inevitably entails a degree of modern political projection". Jesse D. Sloane chose to use "Parhae" because it was not covered in depth in the state-mandated curriculum of China, but used Chinese romanization for all other terms related to Parhae that appeared in Chinese sources first. Neither Crossley or Sloane meant to depict Parhae as essentially Chinese but used Chinese romanization out of convenience and to acknowledge the transnational origins of Parhae discourse.

According to the Shoku Nihongi, Japanese diplomatic communications with Parhae recognized it as a "state of Go[gu]ryeo." In a diplomatic mission to Japan in 727 or 728, the Parhae envoy said that Parhae has "recovered the lost land of Goguryeo and inherited the old traditions of Buyeo." Wooden tablets discovered in Nara Prefecture state that an envoy to Parhae in 758 was called a Goryeo envoy. Mun of Balhae referred to himself as "King of Goryeo" but Reisa Shimoda suggests that this was not to restore the old name, as noted in the Dai Nihonshi, but as a means of gaining Japan's favor by invoking Goryeo. Cho lee-ok suggests that Mun's claim to the title of "Heavenly Descendant" was inherited from Goguryeo. Examples of Parhae envoys being referred to as Goryeo envoys and Parhae kings as the king of Goryeo are found extensively in the Nara Period (710–794) but have not been found during the later Heian Period (794–1185).

Sign in to keep reading

9 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Post-classical