Lably
Skip to content

Resistance during World War II

Irregular forces in World War II

  • 40 min read
  • 11 chapters

Related on Lably

Through World War II, Nazi Germany and French Resistance

While resistance groups played a significant auxiliary role in harassing the enemy, their military impact was limited, and they were incapable of liberating their nations alone. Overall, the effectiveness of resistance movements during World War II is generally measured more by their political and moral impact than their decisive military contribution to the overall Allied victory.

Assessment

By 1941, British assessment of Allied resistance groups suggested that although Nazi Germany now controlled much of Europe, only Czechoslovakia, Poland and (in Asia) China had considerable resistance networks. Although by 1942 resistance groups formed in most occupied territories, the assessments of effectiveness of large resistance networks such as Soviet partisans and French Resistance suggests that they did not significantly hamper German operations until late 1943. All resistance movements were also significantly dependent on support from Allied powers.

Resistance also encompassed activities beyond armed combat, such as sabotage, espionage, assisting escapees from Nazis, and other activities.

Overall assessment of resistance effectiveness is a matter of debate among historians. Jørgen Hæstrup argued that resistance activities "influenced the course of the War decisively [particularly] in the psychological sector". According to Evan Mawdsley, however, in military terms, "the resistance did not do a great deal to achieve the strategic objectives" of major Allied powers, failing (with few late war exceptions) to regain territory or tie-down frontline German troops. J. R. Seeger notes that in specific campaigns, the resistance was considered highly valuable, and on the "rare occasions" resistance forces were able to tie down German troops, this benefited conventional Allied forces in that theater, but often resulted in "horrific Nazi reprisals". Mawdsley does, however, acknowledge that the resistance movements played "a significant auxiliary role in the area of sabotage and the gathering of intelligence", and that the movements had "great political and moral (and propaganda) importance", translating to their subsequent significant impact on collective memory.

Sign in to keep reading

10 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Modern