Weyl group

Weyl chambers

If ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Phi }\subset V}$ is a root system, we may consider the hyperplane perpendicular to each root ${\displaystyle \alpha }$. Recall that ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }}$ denotes the reflection about the hyperplane and that the Weyl group is the group of transformations of ${\displaystyle V}$ generated by all the ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }}$'s. The complement of the set of hyperplanes is disconnected, and each connected component is called a Weyl chamber. If we have fixed a particular set Δ of simple roots, we may define the fundamental Weyl chamber associated to Δ as the set of points ${\displaystyle v\in V}$ such that ${\displaystyle (\alpha ,v)>0}$ for all ${\displaystyle \alpha \in \mathrm{\Delta }}$.

Since the reflections ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha },\alpha \in \mathrm{\Phi }}$ preserve ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Phi }}$, they also preserve the set of hyperplanes perpendicular to the roots. Thus, each Weyl group element permutes the Weyl chambers.

The figure illustrates the case of the A2 root system. The "hyperplanes" (in this case, one dimensional) orthogonal to the roots are indicated by dashed lines. The six 60-degree sectors are the Weyl chambers and the shaded region is the fundamental Weyl chamber associated to the indicated base.

A basic general theorem about Weyl chambers is this:

Theorem: The Weyl group acts freely and transitively on the Weyl chambers. Thus, the order of the Weyl group is equal to the number of Weyl chambers.

A related result is this one:

Theorem: Fix a Weyl chamber ${\displaystyle C}$. Then for all ${\displaystyle v\in V}$, the Weyl-orbit of ${\displaystyle v}$ contains exactly one point in the closure ${\displaystyle \overline{C}}$ of ${\displaystyle C}$.

Coxeter group structure

Generating set

A key result about the Weyl group is this:

Theorem: If ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Delta }}$ is base for ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Phi }}$, then the Weyl group is generated by the reflections ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }}$ with ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ in ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Delta }}$.

That is to say, the group generated by the reflections ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha },\alpha \in \mathrm{\Delta },}$ is the same as the group generated by the reflections ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha },\alpha \in \mathrm{\Phi }}$.

Relations

Meanwhile, if ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ and ${\displaystyle \beta }$ are in ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Delta }}$, then the Dynkin diagram for ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Phi }}$ relative to the base ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Delta }}$ tells us something about how the pair ${\displaystyle \{s_{\alpha },s_{\beta }\}}$ behaves. Specifically, suppose ${\displaystyle v}$ and ${\displaystyle v^{\prime }}$ are the corresponding vertices in the Dynkin diagram. Then we have the following results:

• If there is no bond between ${\displaystyle v}$ and ${\displaystyle v^{\prime }}$, then ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }}$ and ${\displaystyle s_{\beta }}$ commute. Since ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }}$ and ${\displaystyle s_{\beta }}$ each have order two, this is equivalent to saying that ${\displaystyle (s_{\alpha }{s}_{\beta }{)}^2=1}$.
• If there is one bond between ${\displaystyle v}$ and ${\displaystyle v^{\prime }}$, then ${\displaystyle (s_{\alpha }{s}_{\beta }{)}^3=1}$.
• If there are two bonds between ${\displaystyle v}$ and ${\displaystyle v^{\prime }}$, then ${\displaystyle (s_{\alpha }{s}_{\beta }{)}^4=1}$.
• If there are three bonds between ${\displaystyle v}$ and ${\displaystyle v^{\prime }}$, then ${\displaystyle (s_{\alpha }{s}_{\beta }{)}^6=1}$.

The preceding claim is not hard to verify, if we simply remember what the Dynkin diagram tells us about the angle between each pair of roots. If, for example, there is no bond between the two vertices, then ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ and ${\displaystyle \beta }$ are orthogonal, from which it follows easily that the corresponding reflections commute. More generally, the number of bonds determines the angle ${\displaystyle \theta }$ between the roots. The product of the two reflections is then a rotation by angle ${\displaystyle 2\theta }$ in the plane spanned by ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ and ${\displaystyle \beta }$, as the reader may verify, from which the above claim follows easily.

As a Coxeter group

Weyl groups are examples of finite reflection groups, as they are generated by reflections; the abstract groups (not considered as subgroups of a linear group) are accordingly finite Coxeter groups, which allows them to be classified by their Coxeter–Dynkin diagram. Being a Coxeter group means that a Weyl group has a special kind of presentation in which each generator x_i is of order two, and the relations other than x_i²=1 are of the form (x_ix_j)^m_ij=1. The generators are the reflections given by simple roots, and m_ij is 2, 3, 4, or 6 depending on whether roots i and j make an angle of 90, 120, 135, or 150 degrees, i.e., whether in the Dynkin diagram they are unconnected, connected by a simple edge, connected by a double edge, or connected by a triple edge. We have already noted these relations in the bullet points above, but to say that ${\displaystyle W}$ is a Coxeter group, we are saying that those are the only relations in ${\displaystyle W}$.

Weyl groups have a Bruhat order and length function in terms of this presentation: the length of a Weyl group element is the length of the shortest word representing that element in terms of these standard generators. There is a unique longest element of a Coxeter group, which is opposite to the identity in the Bruhat order.

Weyl groups in algebraic, group-theoretic, and geometric settings

Above, the Weyl group was defined as a subgroup of the isometry group of a root system. There are also various definitions of Weyl groups specific to various group-theoretic and geometric contexts (Lie algebra, Lie group, symmetric space, etc.). For each of these ways of defining Weyl groups, it is a (usually nontrivial) theorem that it is a Weyl group in the sense of the definition at the top of this article, namely the Weyl group of some root system associated with the object. A concrete realization of such a Weyl group usually depends on a choice – e.g. of Cartan subalgebra for a Lie algebra, of maximal torus for a Lie group.

The Weyl group of a connected compact Lie group

Let ${\displaystyle K}$ be a connected compact Lie group and let ${\displaystyle T}$ be a maximal torus in ${\displaystyle K}$. We then introduce the normalizer of ${\displaystyle T}$ in ${\displaystyle K}$, denoted ${\displaystyle N(T)}$ and defined as

${\displaystyle N(T)=\{x\in K|xt{x}^{-1}\in T,\text{for all }t\in T\}}$.

We also define the centralizer of ${\displaystyle T}$ in ${\displaystyle K}$, denoted ${\displaystyle Z(T)}$ and defined as

${\displaystyle Z(T)=\{x\in K|xt{x}^{-1}=t\text{for all }t\in T\}}$.

The Weyl group ${\displaystyle W}$ of ${\displaystyle K}$ (relative to the given maximal torus ${\displaystyle T}$) is then defined initially as

${\displaystyle W=N(T)/T}$.

Eventually, one proves that ${\displaystyle Z(T)=T}$, at which point one has an alternative description of the Weyl group as

${\displaystyle W=N(T)/Z(T)}$.

Now, one can define a root system ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Phi }}$ associated to the pair ${\displaystyle (K,T)}$; the roots are the nonzero weights of the adjoint action of ${\displaystyle T}$ on the Lie algebra of ${\displaystyle K}$. For each ${\displaystyle \alpha \in \mathrm{\Phi }}$, one can construct an element ${\displaystyle x_{\alpha }}$ of ${\displaystyle N(T)}$ whose action on ${\displaystyle T}$ has the form of reflection. With a bit more effort, one can show that these reflections generate all of ${\displaystyle N(T)/Z(T)}$. Thus, in the end, the Weyl group as defined as ${\displaystyle N(T)/T}$ or ${\displaystyle N(T)/Z(T)}$ is isomorphic to the Weyl group of the root system ${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Phi }}$.

In other settings

For a complex semisimple Lie algebra, the Weyl group is simply defined as the reflection group generated by reflections in the roots – the specific realization of the root system depending on a choice of Cartan subalgebra.

For a Lie group G satisfying certain conditions, given a torus T < G (which need not be maximal), the Weyl group with respect to that torus is defined as the quotient of the normalizer of the torus N = N(T) = N_G(T) by the centralizer of the torus Z = Z(T) = Z_G(T),

${\displaystyle W(T,G):=N(T)/Z(T).}$

The group W is finite – Z is of finite index in N. If T = T₀ is a maximal torus (so it equals its own centralizer: ${\displaystyle Z(T_0)=T_0}$) then the resulting quotient N/Z = N/T is called the Weyl group of G, and denoted W(G). Note that the specific quotient set depends on a choice of maximal torus, but the resulting groups are all isomorphic (by an inner automorphism of G), since maximal tori are conjugate.

If G is compact and connected, and T is a maximal torus, then the Weyl group of G is isomorphic to the Weyl group of its Lie algebra, as discussed above.

For example, for the general linear group GL, a maximal torus is the subgroup D of invertible diagonal matrices, whose normalizer is the generalized permutation matrices (matrices in the form of permutation matrices, but with any non-zero numbers in place of the '1's), and whose Weyl group is the symmetric group. In this case the quotient map N → N/T splits (via the permutation matrices), so the normalizer N is a semidirect product of the torus and the Weyl group, and the Weyl group can be expressed as a subgroup of G. In general this is not always the case – the quotient does not always split, the normalizer N is not always the semidirect product of W and Z, and the Weyl group cannot always be realized as a subgroup of G.

Bruhat decomposition

If B is a Borel subgroup of G, i.e., a maximal connected solvable subgroup and a maximal torus T = T₀ is chosen to lie in B, then we obtain the Bruhat decomposition

${\displaystyle G=\bigcup _{w\in W}BwB}$

which gives rise to the decomposition of the flag variety G/B into Schubert cells (see Grassmannian).

The structure of the Hasse diagram of the group is related geometrically to the cohomology of the manifold (rather, of the real and complex forms of the group), which is constrained by Poincaré duality. Thus algebraic properties of the Weyl group correspond to general topological properties of manifolds. For instance, Poincaré duality gives a pairing between cells in dimension k and in dimension n - k (where n is the dimension of a manifold): the bottom (0) dimensional cell corresponds to the identity element of the Weyl group, and the dual top-dimensional cell corresponds to the longest element of a Coxeter group.

Analogy with algebraic groups

There are a number of analogies between algebraic groups and Weyl groups – for instance, the number of elements of the symmetric group is n!, and the number of elements of the general linear group over a finite field is related to the q-factorial ${\displaystyle [n{]}_q!}$; thus the symmetric group behaves as though it were a linear group over "the field with one element". This is formalized by the field with one element, which considers Weyl groups to be simple algebraic groups over the field with one element.

Cohomology

For a non-abelian connected compact Lie group G, the first group cohomology of the Weyl group W with coefficients in the maximal torus T used to define it, is related to the outer automorphism group of the normalizer ${\displaystyle N=N_G(T),}$ as:

${\displaystyle \mathrm{Out}(N)\cong H^1(W;T)⋊\mathrm{Out}(G).}$

The outer automorphisms of the group Out(G) are essentially the diagram automorphisms of the Dynkin diagram, while the group cohomology is computed in Hämmerli, Matthey & Suter 2004 and is a finite elementary abelian 2-group (${\displaystyle (\mathbf{Z}/2{)}^k}$); for simple Lie groups it has order 1, 2, or 4. The 0th and 2nd group cohomology are also closely related to the normalizer.