Lably
Skip to content

When Prophecy Fails

1956 book of social psychology

  • 11 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Coping, Cognitive dissonance and Jesus

Overview

Festinger, Riecken, and Schachter were already studying the effects of prophecy disconfirmation on groups of believers when they read a story in a local newspaper headlined "Prophecy from Planet. Clarion Call to City: Flee That Flood. It'll Swamp us on Dec. 21". The prophecy came from Dorothy Martin (1900–1992), a Chicago housewife who practised automatic writing, and it outlined a catastrophe predicted for a specific date in their near future. Seeing an opportunity to test their theories with a contemporary case study, the research team infiltrated Martin's followers to collect data before, during, and after the time the prophecy would be refuted.

Martin claimed to be receiving messages from superior beings from a planet she referred to as Clarion. A recently published book, Aboard a Flying Saucer by UFO contactee Truman Bethurum, had described his alleged interactions with beings from a planet also named Clarion. The messages received by Martin included a prophecy that Lake City and large portions of the United States, Canada, Central America, and Europe would be destroyed by a flood before dawn on December 21, 1954. Through the restrained recruitment activities of Charles Laughead (a college doctor in Michigan) and other acquaintances, Martin was supported in her mediumship by a small group of believers. Some of the believers took significant actions that indicated a high degree of commitment to the prophecy. Some left or lost their jobs, neglected or ended their studies, ended relationships and friendships with non-believers, gave away money, and/or disposed of possessions to prepare for their departure on a flying saucer, which they believed would rescue them and others before the flood.

As anticipated by the research team, the prophesied date passed without any sign of the predicted flood, creating a dissonance between the group's commitment to the prophecy and the unfolding reality. Different members of the group reacted differently. Many of those with the highest levels of belief, commitment, and social support became more committed to their beliefs, began to court publicity in ways they had not before, and developed various rationalizations for the absence of the flood. Some others, with less prior conviction and commitment, and/or less access to ongoing group support, were less able to sustain or increase their previous levels of belief and involvement, and several left the group. The research team's findings were broadly in line with their initial hypothesis about how believers might react to a prophecy disconfirmation, depending on whether certain conditions were in place.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Psychology