Ancient history of Transylvania
- 5 min read
- 4 chapters
Related on Lably
Through Human migration
The Dacians rebelled frequently, with the largest uprising occurring after the death of Emperor Trajan. Sarmatians and Burs were allowed to settle inside Dacia Trajana after repeated clashes with the Roman administration. During the 3rd century increasing pressure from the free Dacians (Carpians) and Visigoths forced the Romans to abandon exposed Dacia Trajana.
In 271, the Roman Emperor Aurelian abandoned Dacia Trajana and reorganised a new Dacia Aureliana inside former Moesia Superior. The abandonment of Dacia Trajana by the Romans is mentioned by Eutropius in his Breviarium Liber Nonus. Eutropius was a 4th-century Roman historian and civil servant who served under several emperors. His Breviarium is a concise history of Rome from its founding to his own time, and remains a valuable source for historians due to its coverage of otherwise poorly documented periods.
The province of Dacia, which Trajan had formed beyond the Danube, he gave up, despairing, after all Illyricum and Moesia had been depopulated, of being able to retain it. The Roman citizens, removed from the town and lands of Dacia, he settled in the interior of Moesia, calling that Dacia which now divides the two Moesiae, and which is on the right hand of the Danube as it runs to the sea, whereas Dacia was previously on the left.
Visigoths
The first wave of the Great Migrations, (300 to 500) brought the influence of migratory tribes, especially the Germanic tribes. The Visigoths established a kingdom north of the Danube and in Transylvania between 270 and 380. The region was known by Romans as Guthiuda and includes the region between Alutus (Olt) and Ister (Danube) too. It is unclear whether they used the term Kaukaland (land of the mountains) for Transylvania proper or the whole Carpathians. The (Vizi)Goths were unable to preserve the region's Roman-era infrastructures. The gold mines of Transylvania were ruined and unused during the Early Middle Ages. Ulfilas had carried (around 340) Homoean Arianism to the Goths living in Guthiuda with such success that the Visigoths and other Germanic tribes became staunch Arians. When the Goths entered the Roman Empire (around 380) and founded successor kingdoms, most had been Arian Christians.
Sign in to keep reading
3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.
Huns
In 380 a new power arrived in Transylvania, the Huns. They drove back most Germanic groups from the Carpathian Basin except the Gepids. The Alans, Vandals, Quadi left the region toward the Roman Empire. The Huns extended their rule over Transylvania after 420. After the disintegration of Attila's empire, Transylvania was inhabited by the remnants of various Hunnic tribes, alongside a Germanic people, the Gepids.“The Transylvanian Gepids held a semi-independent status within the Kingdom of the Gepids
Avars
The rule of Gepids was crushed by a Lombard and Eurasian Avar attack in year 567. In fact, the Gepids were exterminated from the region. We know only about slight Gepid remnants (cemeteries) in the Banat region after 600. In Transylvania we have no traces which indicate a Gepids continuity after 567. By 568, the Avars under the capable leadership of their Kagan, Bayan, established in the Carpathian Basin an empire that lasted for 250 years. During these 250 years the Slavs were allowed to settle inside Transylvania and they started to clear the Carpathian's virgin forests. The Avars meet their demise with the rise of Charlemagne's Frankish empire. After a fierce seven-year war and civil war between the Kagan and Yugurrus which lasted from 796-803, the Avars were defeated. The Transylvanian Avars were, subjugated by the Bulgars under Khan Krum at the beginning of the 9th century and Transylvania, along with eastern Pannonia, was incorporated into the First Bulgarian Empire.
Magyars in Transylvania (10-11th century)
In 862, Moravian Prince Rastislav rebelled against his lord, hired Magyar troops to help him, and with their aid he won his independence. This is the first time when Magyar expedition troops entered the Carpathians Basin. After a devastating Bulgar and Pecheneg attack the Magyar tribes crossed the Carpathians and occupied the entire basin without significant resistance. According to the Gesta Ungarorum from the 11th century they entered Transylvania first, where Prince Almos was killed: "Almus in patria Erdelw occisus est, non enim potuit in Pannoniam introire". According to some archeological findings near Turda (Golds of Prince Berthold of Bavaria) Transylvanian Magyars also participated in several raids against the West, Italy, or the Balkans. Although the defeat in the Battle of Lech in 955 stopped the Magyar raids against western Europe, the raids on the Balkan Peninsula continued for one more decade.
The history of Transylvania during the early Middle Ages is difficult to ascertain due to the scarcity of reliable written and archaeological evidence. Two major competing theories have long divided historians on a fundamental question: whether the Romanised Dacian population, considered one of the ancestors of the modern Romanians, continued to inhabit Transylvania after the Roman withdrawal, or whether the region was effectively depopulated and later resettled.
The first theory, favored in Romanian historiography, holds that a Romanised population remained in Transylvania throughout the Migration period, maintaining continuity from the Roman era through to the arrival of the Magyars. This view supports the argument that Romanians were the original and continuous inhabitants of the region.
The second theory, more prominent in Hungarian historiography, argues that Transylvania was largely abandoned following the Roman retreat, and that Romanians migrated into the region from south of the Danube at a later date, arriving after or alongside the Magyar settlement. Under this interpretation, the Magyars were the first major organized political presence in medieval Transylvania.
Both theories carry significant political weight, as they have historically been used to support competing national claims over the region. The debate remains unresolved, with scholars continuing to reinterpret the limited archaeological and documentary evidence.