Lably
Skip to content

Ancient Macedonian language

Ancient Hellenic variety

  • 20 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Epigraphy

While the bulk of surviving public and private inscriptions found in ancient Macedonia were written in Attic Greek (and later in Koine Greek), fragmentary documentation of a vernacular local Macedonian variety comes from onomastic evidence, ancient glossaries, and recent epigraphic discoveries in the Greek region of Macedonia, such as the curse tablets from Pella and Pydna.

Classification

There has been some recent scholarly agreement, often expressed as cautious or tentative, that ancient Macedonian was a dialect of the Northwest Greek group. However, a minority of scholars has suggested that ancient Macedonian was most likely a separate Indo-European language closely related to Greek rather than a simple dialect. Suggested classifications include:

  • A Greek dialect, part of the Northwest Doric group of dialects; pioneered by Friedrich Wilhelm Sturz (1808), and subsequently supported by Olivier Masson (1996), Irad Malkin (2001), Michael Meier-Brügger (2003), Johannes Engels (2010), Simon Hornblower (2011), J. Méndez Dosuna (2012), Georgios Babiniotis (2014), Joachim Matzinger (2016), Georgios Giannakis (2017), Claude Brixhe (2018), M. B. Hatzopoulos (2017, 2020), Emilio Crespo (2017, 2023), Lucien Van Beek (2022) and Jessica Lamont (2023).
  • A Greek dialect related to, or a version of, Aeolic Greek; suggested by August Fick (1874), Otto Hoffmann (1906), N. G. L. Hammond (1997), Ian Worthington (2012) and Wojciech Sowa (2007, 2018, 2022).
  • A sister language of Greek, according to a scheme in which Macedonian and Greek are the two branches of a Greek–Macedonian subgroup, also called Hellenic (or Helleno-Macedonian) suggested by Georgiev (1966), Joseph (2001) and Hamp (2013).

Scholars have variously proposed that ancient Macedonian was a dialect of Greek, a sister language, or an independent Indo-European language, and the disputes have sometimes had modern nationalistic overtones. Research has also considered the extent of influence from Thessalian Aeolic Greek and non-Greek substrata or adstrata, such as Phrygian, Illyrian, and Thracian. Hammond suggests that in the region of Upper Macedonia, the tribes of Elimiotes, Orestes, Lyncestae, and Pelagones, were all Epirotic Molossian tribes speaking the Northwest Greek dialect, while the inhabitants of Lower Macedonia spoke an Aeolic dialect. Sowa also suggests that ancient Macedonian can be interpreted as a Greek dialect of originally Aeolic provenance with strong influences from Northwest Doric, as well as from non-Greek languages. Hatzopoulos and Crespo suggest that the ancient Macedonian dialect was of Northwest Doric origin but also shared isoglosses with Thessalian, an Aeolic dialect. According to Angelos Boufalis, in the Macedonian dialect, "several features can be established as local and most of them seem indeed to be shared with the NW Doric and/or the Thessalian dialect"; and "rather than a monolithic dialect throughout, different local or regional idioms may have had been spoken in this extensive geographical area".

Language tree

The following tree is based on the work of Lucien van Beek:

  • Graeco-Phrygian
    • Greek
      • South Greek
      • North Greek
        • Aeolic
          • Boeotian (it also has West Greek features; precursor was possibly a bridge dialect between Aeolic and West Greek)
          • Lesbian (it also has at least one archaic South Greek innovation; precursor was possibly a bridge dialect between Aeolic and South Greek)
          • Thessalian
        • West Greek
        • Ancient Macedonian
    • Phrygian

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Ancient history