Lably
Skip to content

Atthakatha

Commentaries on the Pāli Canon

  • 5 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Buddhist canons, Common Era and Schools of Buddhism

According to K.R. Norman:

There is no direct evidence that any commentarial material was in fact recited at the first council, but there is clear evidence that some parts of the commentaries are very old, perhaps even going back to the time of the Buddha, because they afford parallels with texts which are regarded as canonical by other sects, and must therefore pre-date the schisms between the sects. As has already been noted, some canonical texts include commentarial passages, while the existence of the Old Commentary in the Vinaya-pitaka and the canonical status of the Niddesa prove that some sort of exegesis was felt to be needed at a very early stage of Buddhism.

As with the Canon itself, the contents of collected editions of the Theravadin commentaries, compiled from the fourth century CE onwards, vary between editions. The minimal collection, found in the Thai edition (1992) includes the following (Skilling 2002).

In addition, the following are included in one or both of the other two editions: the Burmese Chatthasangayana edition (a list of contents can be found in Thein Han 1981) and the Sinhalese Simon Hewavitarne Bequest edition.

  • The Patimokkha (Pruitt & Norman 2001, page xxxvi) and its commentary Kankhavitarani, ascribed to Buddhaghosa
  • Commentary by Dhammapala on the Nettipakarana, a work sometimes included in the canon.
  • Vinayasangaha, a selection of passages from Samantapasadika arranged topically by Sariputta in the twelfth century (Crosby 2006).
  • Saratthasamuccaya, commentary on the Paritta. In Sinhalese (Malalasekera 1938).

In addition, there are treatises like Buddhaghosa's Visuddhimagga, a systematic presentation of the traditional teaching. This work, noted in both Sinhalese (Mori et al. 1994) and Burmese traditions, is sometimes loosely referred to as a "commentary" on the first four nikāyas for the material it details, although it is not traditionally considered as an "Aṭṭhakathā" (see Pakaranavisesa).

Buddhaghosa

Below is a listing of fourth- or fifth-century CE commentator Buddhaghosa's fourteen alleged commentaries (Pāli: atthakatha) on the Pāli Tipitaka (Norman 1983).

Only the Visuddhimagga and the commentaries on the first four nikayas are accepted by a consensus of scholars as Buddhaghosa's.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Religion