Lably
Skip to content

Bochner's theorem

Theorem of Fourier transforms of Borel measures

  • 3 min read
  • 3 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Mathematics, Statistics and Time series

The theorem for locally compact abelian groups

Bochner's theorem for a locally compact abelian group G, with dual group G^, says the following:

Theorem For any normalized continuous positive-definite function f:G→C (normalization here means that f is 1 at the unit of G), there exists a unique probability measure μ on G^ such that

f(g)=∫G^ξ(g)dμ(ξ),

i.e. f is the Fourier transform of a unique probability measure μ on G^. Conversely, the Fourier transform of a probability measure on G^ is necessarily a normalized continuous positive-definite function f on G. This is in fact a one-to-one correspondence.

The Gelfand–Fourier transform is an isomorphism between the group C*-algebra C∗(G) and C0(G^). The theorem is essentially the dual statement for states of the two abelian C*-algebras.

The proof of the theorem passes through vector states on strongly continuous unitary representations of G (the proof in fact shows that every normalized continuous positive-definite function must be of this form).

Given a normalized continuous positive-definite function f on G, one can construct a strongly continuous unitary representation of G in a natural way: Let F0(G) be the family of complex-valued functions on G with finite support, i.e. h(g)=0 for all but finitely many g. The positive-definite kernel K(g1,g2)=f(g1−g2) induces a (possibly degenerate) inner product on F0(G). Quotienting out degeneracy and taking the completion gives a Hilbert space

(H,⟨⋅,⋅⟩f),

whose typical element is an equivalence class [h]. For a fixed g in G, the "shift operator" Ug defined by (Ugh)(g′)=h(g′−g), for a representative of [h], is unitary. So the map

g↦Ug

is a unitary representations of G on (H,⟨⋅,⋅⟩f). By continuity of f, it is weakly continuous, therefore strongly continuous. By construction, we have

⟨Ug[e],[e]⟩f=f(g),

where [e] is the class of the function that is 1 on the identity of G and zero elsewhere. But by Gelfand–Fourier isomorphism, the vector state ⟨⋅[e],[e]⟩f on C∗(G) is the pullback of a state on C0(G^), which is necessarily integration against a probability measure μ. Chasing through the isomorphisms then gives

⟨Ug[e],[e]⟩f=∫G^ξ(g)dμ(ξ).

On the other hand, given a probability measure μ on G^, the function

f(g)=∫G^ξ(g)dμ(ξ)

is a normalized continuous positive-definite function. Continuity of f follows from the dominated convergence theorem. For positive-definiteness, take a nondegenerate representation of C0(G^). This extends uniquely to a representation of its multiplier algebra Cb(G^) and therefore a strongly continuous unitary representation Ug. As above we have f given by some vector state on Ug

f(g)=⟨Ugv,v⟩,

therefore positive-definite.

The two constructions are mutual inverses.

Sign in to keep reading

2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Topics in mathematics