Lably
Skip to content

Complete Boolean algebra

Boolean algebra with all operators and laws forming a complete logical system

  • 6 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Mathematics, Boolean algebra (structure) and Subset

More generally, for some cardinal κ, a Boolean algebra is called κ-complete if every subset of cardinality less than or equal to κ has a supremum.

Examples

Complete Boolean algebras

  • Every finite Boolean algebra is complete.
  • The algebra of subsets of a given set is a complete Boolean algebra.
  • The regular open sets of any topological space form a complete Boolean algebra. This example is of particular importance because every forcing poset can be considered as a topological space (a base for the topology consisting of sets that are the set of all elements less than or equal to a given element). The corresponding regular open algebra can be used to form Boolean-valued models which are then equivalent to generic extensions by the given forcing poset.
  • The algebra of all measurable subsets of a σ-finite measure space, modulo null sets, is a complete Boolean algebra. When the measure space is the unit interval with the σ-algebra of Lebesgue measurable sets, the Boolean algebra is called the random algebra.
  • The Boolean algebra of all Baire sets modulo meager sets in a topological space with a countable base is complete; when the topological space is the real numbers the algebra is sometimes called the Cantor algebra.

Non-complete Boolean algebras

  • The algebra of all subsets of an infinite set that are finite or have finite complement is a Boolean algebra but is not complete.
  • The algebra of all measurable subsets of a measure space is a ℵ1-complete Boolean algebra, but is not usually complete.
  • Another example of a Boolean algebra that is not complete is the Boolean algebra P(ω) of all sets of natural numbers, quotiented out by the ideal Fin of finite subsets. The resulting object, denoted P(ω)/Fin, consists of all equivalence classes of sets of naturals, where the relevant equivalence relation is that two sets of naturals are equivalent if their symmetric difference is finite. The Boolean operations are defined analogously, for example, if A and B are two equivalence classes in P(ω)/Fin, we define A∧B to be the equivalence class of a∩b, where a and b are some (any) elements of A and B respectively.
Now let a0, a1, ... be pairwise disjoint infinite sets of naturals, and let A0, A1, ... be their corresponding equivalence classes in P(ω)/Fin. Then given any upper bound X of A0, A1, ... in P(ω)/Fin, we can find a lesser upper bound, by removing from a representative for X one element of each an. Therefore the An have no supremum.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Topics in mathematics