Lably
Skip to content

Digital media use and mental health

Mental health effects of using digital media

  • 27 min read
  • 10 chapters
Jay Wennington 2014-10-28
Jay Wennington jaywennington · CC0

Related on Lably

Through UNICEF and Medical diagnosis

The distinction between beneficial and excessive digital media use has not yet been clearly established. Few widely accepted diagnostic criteria exist for problematic or pathological use, although some experts have suggested that overuse may be related to underlying psychiatric disorders. Recommendations for safer media use for children and families have been proposed, but prevention and treatment strategies are not standardized. Research also highlights ongoing debate regarding the classification of problematic digital media behaviours and the appropriateness of terms such as "addiction."

Digital media use, including time spent on social media platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, as well as Facebook, has been associated with both positive and negative effects on the cognitive, social and emotional development of children and adolescents. Evidence suggests that the relationship between digital media use and mental health outcomes is complex and may vary depending on the individual, the type of platform used, and patterns of engagement.

A 2017 study by He, Turel, and Bechara reported that excessive social media use was associated with reduced gray matter volume in brain regions involved in attention and impulse control, suggesting potential structural changes related to long-term overstimulation.

History and terminology

The relationship between digital technology and mental health has been studied from multiple perspectives. Research has identified benefits of digital media use for childhood and adolescent development. However, researchers, clinicians, and the public have also expressed concern over compulsive behaviours linked to digital media use, as increasing evidence shows correlations between excessive technology use and mental health issues.

Terminologies used to refer to compulsive digital-media-use behaviours are not standardized or universally recognised. They include "digital addiction", "digital dependence", "problematic use", or "overuse", often delineated by the digital media platform used or under study (such as problematic smartphone use or problematic internet use). Unrestrained use of technological devices may affect developmental, social, mental and physical well-being and may result in symptoms akin to other psychological dependence syndromes, or behavioral addictions. The focus on problematic technology use in research, particularly in relation to the behavioural addiction paradigm, is becoming more accepted, despite poor standardization and conflicting research.

Internet addiction has been proposed as a diagnosis since 1998 and social media and its relation to addiction has been examined since 2009. A 2018 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report stated there were benefits of structured and limited internet use in children and adolescents for developmental and educational purposes, but that excessive use can have a negative impact on mental well-being. The report also noted a 40% overall increase in internet use among school-age children between 2010 and 2015, with significant variations in usage rates and platform preferences across different OECD countries. The American Psychological Association recommends that adolescents receive training or coaching on social media use to help them develop psychologically informed skills and competencies, promoting balanced, safe, and meaningful engagement online.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has not formally classified problematic digital media use as a diagnostic category but identified internet gaming disorder as a condition warranting further study in 2013. Meanwhile, gaming disorder—commonly known as video game addiction—is recognized in the ICD-11. The differing recommendations between the DSM and ICD partly reflect a lack of expert consensus, variations in the focus of each classification system, and challenges in applying animal models to behavioural addictions.

The utility of the term addiction in relation to the overuse of digital media has been questioned, in regard to its suitability to describe new, digitally mediated psychiatric categories, as opposed to overuse being a manifestation of other psychiatric disorders. Usage of the term has also been criticised for drawing parallels with substance use behaviours. Careless use of the term may cause more problems—both downplaying the risks of harm in seriously affected people, as well as overstating risks of excessive, non-pathological use of digital media. The evolution of terminology relating excessive digital media use to problematic use rather than addiction was encouraged by Panova and Carbonell, psychologists at Ramon Llull University, in a 2018 review.

Due to the lack of recognition and consensus on the concepts used, diagnoses and treatments are difficult to standardize or develop. Heightened levels of public anxiety around new media (including social media, smartphones and video games) adds confusion to the interpretation of population-based assessments, as well as posing management dilemmas. Radesky and Christakis, the 2019 editors of JAMA Paediatrics, published a review that investigated "concerns about health and developmental/behavioural risks of excessive media use for child cognitive, language, literacy, and social-emotional development." Due to the ready availability of multiple technologies to children worldwide, the problem is bi-directional, as taking away digital devices may have a detrimental effect, in areas such as learning, family relationship dynamics, and overall development.

Sign in to keep reading

9 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Social studies