Lably
Skip to content

Lonsdaleite

Hexagonal lattice allotrope of carbon

  • 5 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Crystal structure, Allotropes of carbon and Refractive index

It is translucent and brownish-yellow and has an index of refraction of 2.40–2.41 and a specific gravity of 3.2–3.3. Its hardness is theoretically superior to that of cubic diamond (up to 58% more), according to computational simulations, but natural specimens exhibited somewhat lower hardness through a large range of values (from 7–8 on Mohs hardness scale). The cause is speculated to be due to the samples having been riddled with lattice defects and impurities.

In addition to meteorite deposits, hexagonal diamond has been synthesized in the laboratory (1966 or earlier; published in 1967) by compressing and heating graphite either in a static press or using explosives, albeit in fragmentary state. The first bulk synthesis of hexagonal diamond in pure form was reported in 2025.

Hardness

According to the conventional interpretation of the results of examining the meagre samples collected from meteorites or manufactured in the lab, lonsdaleite has a hexagonal unit cell, related to the diamond unit cell in the same way that the hexagonal and cubic close packed crystal systems are related. Its diamond structure can be considered to be made up of interlocking rings of six carbon atoms, in the chair conformation. In lonsdaleite, some rings are in the boat conformation instead. At nanoscale dimensions, cubic diamond is represented by diamondoids while hexagonal diamond is represented by wurtzoids.

In diamond, all the carbon-to-carbon bonds, both within a layer of rings and between them, are in the staggered conformation, thus causing all four cubic-diagonal directions to be equivalent; whereas in lonsdaleite the bonds between layers are in the eclipsed conformation, which defines the axis of hexagonal symmetry.

Mineralogical simulation predicts lonsdaleite to be 58% harder than diamond on the <100> face, and to resist indentation pressures of 152 GPa, whereas diamond would break at 97 GPa. This is yet exceeded by IIa (the purest natural) diamond's <111> tip hardness of 167 GPa.

The extrapolated properties of lonsdaleite have been questioned in 2014, particularly its superior hardness, since specimens under crystallographic inspection have not shown a bulk hexagonal lattice structure, but instead a conventional cubic diamond dominated by structural defects that include hexagonal sequences. A 2015 quantitative analysis of the X-ray diffraction data of lonsdaleite has shown that about equal amounts of hexagonal and cubic stacking sequences are present. Consequently, it has been suggested that "stacking disordered diamond" is the most accurate structural description of lonsdaleite. On the other hand, 2016–2017 shock experiments with in situ X-ray diffraction show strong evidence for creation of relatively pure lonsdaleite in dynamic high-pressure environments comparable to meteorite impacts.

In 2025, Chinese scientists measured the material properties of their bulk-synthesized lonsdaleite. It has an asymptotic (at 9.8 N) Vickers hardness of 114±6.4 GPa along the axial direction and 106±5.7 GPa along the radial direction, which is comparable to that of natural diamond (about 110 Gpa on the {100} plane). Using ultrasound the Young's modulus was measured at 1229±15 GPa, and the shear modulus at 516±18 GPa, slightly higher than that of single-crystal (100) cubic diamond. This confirms that lonsdaleite is stiffer than cubic diamond.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Chemistry