Lably
Skip to content

Music and politics

  • 47 min read
  • 13 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Natural language processing, State (polity) and Civil rights movement

Introduction

In a study that used natural language processing, it was suggested that, comparatively to less charged music, political music lets listeners start a dialogue based on it.

Participants who engaged in the informed discourse about music are aware that it is not inherently political. If music listeners (including performers, composers, politicians and authorities who know music because they listen to it) "see" a relationship between certain music and politics, this is because, as a result of consequential logic, they attribute to this music the capacity to initiate certain (political) beliefs or behaviours in listeners.

In a 2014 review article, it was shown that political music is used for announcing, or calling for action. The same article states that this is because music is seen as a sign system.


Furthermore, some forms of music may be deemed political by cultural association, irrespective of political content, as evidenced by the way Western pop/rock bands such as The Beatles were censored by the State in the Eastern Bloc in the 1960s and 1970s, while being embraced by younger people as symbolic of social change.

It is difficult to predict how audiences will respond to political music, in terms of aural or even visual cues. Bleich and Zillmann found that "counter to expectations, highly rebellious students did not enjoy defiant rock videos more than did their less rebellious peers, nor did they consume more defiant rock music than did their peers", suggesting there may be little connection between behaviour and musical taste. Pedelty and Keefe argue that "It is not clear to what extent the political messages in and around music motivate fans, become a catalyst for discussion, [or] function aesthetically".

However, in contrast they cite research that concludes, based on interpretive readings of lyrics and performances with a strong emphasis on historical contexts and links to social groups, that "given the right historical circumstances, cultural conditions, and aesthetic qualities, popular music can help bring people together to form effective political communities".

Research that was done in 2012 has also suggested that music education has been used for the instilling patriotism in children, and that particularly during wartime, patriotic singing can escalate to inspire destructive jingoism.

Plato wrote: "musical innovation is full of danger to the whole state, and ought to be prohibited. When modes of music change, the fundamental laws of the state always change with them;" although this was written as a warning it can be taken as a revolutionary statement that music is much more than just melodies and harmonies but an important movement in the life of all human beings.

Sign in to keep reading

12 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Sociology