Lably
Skip to content

Passive daytime radiative cooling

Management strategy for global warming

  • 27 min read
  • 9 chapters
Passive daytime radiative cooling surfaces (PDRC) are efficient in solar reflectance and heat emittance to cool temperatures with zero energy consumption or pollution. Local application of PDRCs can r
NiAxolotl · CC BY-SA 4.0

Related on Lably

Through Greenhouse gas, Temperate climate and Humidity

It has been proposed as a method of reducing temperature increases caused by greenhouse gases by reducing the energy needed for air conditioning, reducing the urban heat island effect, and human body temperatures.

PDRC can aid systems that are more efficient at lower temperatures, such as photovoltaic systems, dew collection devices, and thermoelectric generators.

Some estimates propose that dedicating 1–2% of the Earth's surface area to PDRC would stabilize surface temperatures. Regional variations provide different cooling potentials with desert and temperate climates benefiting more than tropical climates, attributed to the effects of humidity and cloud cover. PDRC can be included in adaptive systems, switching from cooling to heating to mitigate any potential overcooling effects. PDRC applications for indoor space cooling is growing with an estimated "market size of ~$27 billion in 2025".

PDRC surfaces are designed to be high in solar reflectance to minimize heat gain and strong in longwave infrared (LWIR) thermal radiation heat transfer matching the atmosphere's infrared window (8–13 μm). This allows the heat to pass through the atmosphere into space.

PDRC leverages the natural process of radiative cooling, in which the Earth cools by releasing heat to space. PDRC operates during daytime. On a clear day, solar irradiance can reach 1000 W/m2 with a diffuse component between 50 and 100 W/m2. The average PDRC has an estimated cooling power of ~100–150 W/m2.

PDRC applications are deployed as sky-facing surfaces. Low-cost scalable PDRC materials with potential for mass production include coatings, thin films, metafabrics, aerogels, and biodegradable surfaces.

While typically white, other colors can also work, although generally offering less cooling potential.

Research, development, and interest in PDRC has grown rapidly since the 2010s, attributable to a breakthrough in 2014 in the use of photonic metamaterials to increase daytime cooling, along with growing concerns over energy use and global warming. PDRC can be contrasted with conventional compression-based cooling systems (e.g., air conditioners) that consume substantial amounts of energy, have a net heating effect (heating the outdoors more than cooling the indoors), require ready access to electric power and often employ coolants that deplete the ozone layer or have a strong greenhouse effect.

Unlike solar radiation management, PDRC increases heat emission beyond simple reflection.

Implementation

A 2019 study reported that "widescale adoption of radiative cooling could reduce air temperature near the surface, if not the whole atmosphere". To address global warming, PDRC materials must be designed "to ensure that the emission is through the atmospheric transparency window and out to space, rather than just to the atmosphere, which would allow for local but not global cooling".

Currently the Earth is absorbing ~1 W/m2 more than it is emitting, which leads to an overall warming of the climate. By covering ... a small fraction [of the Earth with] thermally emitting materials, the heat flow away from the Earth can be increased, and the net radiative flux can be reduced to zero (or even made negative), thus stabilizing (or cooling) the Earth. ... If only 1%–2% of the Earth’s surface were instead made to radiate at [~100 W/m2] rather than its current average value, the total heat fluxes into and away from the entire Earth would be balanced and warming would cease. ... To offset 1 W/m2 globally, we need approximately 5×1012 m2 of surface coverage with 100 W/m2 radiative emitters .... If used as one continuous area, it corresponds to a little more than half the size of the Sahara Desert. Ideally this area would be broken into several small regions globally (including roofs and other sky-facing surfaces).

— Jeremy Munday

Desert climates have the highest radiative cooling potential due to low year-round humidity and cloud cover, while tropical climates have less potential due to higher humidity and cloud cover. Costs for global implementation have been estimated at $1.25 to $2.5 trillion, or about 3% of annual gross world product (global GDP), with expected economies of scale. Low-cost scalable materials have been developed for widescale implementation, although some challenges toward commercialization remain.

Some studies recommended efforts to maximize solar reflectance, or albedo, of surfaces, with a goal of thermal emittance of 90%. For example, increasing reflectivity from 0.2 (typical rooftop) to 0.9 has a much greater effect than improving an already more reflective surface, such as from 0.9 to 0.97.

Sign in to keep reading

8 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Earth science