Lably
Skip to content

Right to sit

Policies granting the right to be granted suitable seating at work

  • 35 min read
  • 7 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Occupational safety and health and Belgium

A right to sit provision is included in the International Labour Organization's Hygiene (Commerce and Offices) Convention, 1964; the international treaty being ratified by 52 countries as of 2023. EU-OSHA recommends suitable seating as a best practice. Local jurisdictions with right to sit laws include Ann Arbor, Michigan; St. Louis, Missouri; and London's Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.

Some jurisdictions have revoked their right to sit laws, including Quebec, Washington, D.C., the majority of US states, and some cities such as Baltimore, Chicago, and Portland. Many right to sit laws originally contained gendered language specifying women workers only. Some jurisdictions maintain gendered laws, such as Belize and Trinidad and Tobago, but many jurisdictions have amended their right to sit laws to be gender neutral. Jurisdictions without general right to sit laws often grant seating to disabled, pregnant, or minor workers as a reasonable accommodation. In some workplaces, unionized workers have gained suitable seating provisions in their work contracts as part of collective bargaining. The right to stand may also be protected in some jurisdictions, especially for workers with a sitting disability.

About

Right to sit laws have been enacted in some form in countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, and Oceania. Cashiers typically sit down while working in many European countries, where right to sit laws are common. This is partly because many large European retail chains let customers bag their own groceries rather than have the cashier do the bagging.

The German supermarket chain Aldi allows cashiers to sit while attending to their registers, in accordance with German labor law. In jurisdictions without right to sit laws, Aldi still allows their workers to sit down not because of concern for worker health or comfort, but rather due to research which suggests that workers who are allowed to sit down are more productive and efficient.

American corporations have strongly opposed right to sit laws. According to John Logan, the director of Labor and Employment Studies at San Francisco State University, corporate opposition to these laws is "about maintaining unilateral control of the workplace" and maintaining "flexibility" for owners to do what they want.

Some labor unions have demanded suitable seating provisions in worker contracts as part of collective bargaining negotiations.

Sign in to keep reading

6 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Politics and economics