Lably
Skip to content

Arab Revolt

1916–1918 uprising against the Ottoman Turks

  • 28 min read
  • 6 chapters
Soldiers in the Arab Army during the Arab Revolt of 1916-1918, carrying the Arab Flag of the Arab Revolt and pictured in the Hejaz.
Maurice Bauche (1878–1956) · Public domain

Related on Lably

Through Mecca, Middle East and Arab nationalism

On the basis of the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence, exchanged between Henry McMahon of the United Kingdom and Hussein bin Ali of the Kingdom of Hejaz, the rebellion against the ruling Turks was officially initiated at Mecca on 10 June 1916. The primary goal of the Arab rebels was to establish an independent and unified Arab state stretching from Aleppo to Aden, which the British government had promised to recognize.

The Sharifian Army, led by Hussein and the Hashemites with backing from the British military's Egyptian Expeditionary Force, successfully fought and expelled the Ottoman military presence from much of the Hejaz and Transjordan. By 1918, the rebels had captured Damascus and proclaimed the Arab Kingdom of Syria, a short-lived monarchy that was led by Hussein's son Faisal I.

The Arab-majority Ottoman territories of the Middle East were broken up into a number of League of Nations mandates, jointly controlled by the British and the French. Amidst the partition of the Ottoman Empire, the defeated Ottomans' mainland in Anatolia came under a joint military occupation by the victorious Allies. This was gradually broken by the Turkish War of Independence, which established the present-day Republic of Turkey.

Most Arabs in the Ottoman territories stayed loyal to the local Ottoman authorities, and did not join or support the revolt of Hussein bin Ali. Hussein bin Ali's Arab Revolt army did not play a decisive military role in the war. The liberation was led primarily by British and French forces, with the Arab Revolt forces playing a more limited supporting role.

Name

The uprising is conventionally known as the Arab Revolt or the Great Arab Revolt, but its name and the extent of its representative character have been disputed by historians. Aviel Roshwald argues that the designation Arab Revolt is misleading because the uprising was centred on Sharif Hussein and his Hashemite supporters in the Hejaz, rather than constituting a general rebellion by the Ottoman Empire's Arab population. Nuri Yeşilyurt instead uses the term Hijaz Revolt, arguing that it did not represent an overwhelming expression of Arab or Islamic opposition to the Ottoman Empire, but was primarily a local reaction supported by Britain.

The designation Sharifian Revolt is also used in academic literature to emphasise the leadership of Sharif Hussein and the Hashemites. Efraim and Inari Karsh likewise questioned the expanded designation Great Arab Revolt, interpreting the uprising principally as a Hashemite dynastic project rather than as a movement representative of the Arab Ottoman population as a whole.

Sign in to keep reading

5 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Modern