Lably
Skip to content

Eleven-Faced Avalokitesvara Heart Dharani Sutra

Buddhist sutra

  • 8 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Japan and Refuge in Buddhism

This sutra contains the dhāraṇī Heart-dhāraṇī of Avalokiteśvara-ekadaśamukha (Chinese:聖十一面觀自在菩薩根本咒). "Eleven faced Avalokiteśvara" is a form of Avalokiteśvara bodhisattva with eleven heads. In the text, the Buddha introduces, discussed how to practice the dhāraṇī and talks about the benefits and the incredible power of this dhāraṇī.

This is a popular chant throughout East Asia. There is a sung version of the dhāraṇī that is very popular among Asian Buddhists and is performed by famous religious or lay artists, which again is also mislabeled as the Great Compassion Mantra in Sanskrit.

The Dhāraṇī sutra

Title

The title of the sutras in different languages are:

  • Chinese: 佛說十一面觀世音神咒經 (pinyin: Fó shuō shí yī miàn Guānshìyīn shén zhòu jīng) or 圣十一面观自在菩萨根本咒 (pinyin: Shèng shí yī miàn Guānzìzài Púsà gēnběn zhòu
  • Japanese: 十一面神呪心經, Romanji: Jūichimen-jinshushin-gyō
  • The title in Tibetan is Spyan-ras-gzigs-dbang-phyug-shal bcu-gcig-pa,
  • The Sanskrit title recovered from the Tibetan translation is: Avalokiteśvara ekadaśamukha dhāraṇī.
  • Alternatively, the sutra's title has been translated as the Eleven-Faced Avalokitesvara Heart Dharani Sutra by Professor Ryuichi Abe.

Versions

There are several versions, which are often confused with each other. It is generally believed that this dhāraṇī has no direct relationship with the Great Compassion Mantra in Mahayana Buddhism. However, it is often falsely named as the Tibetan Great Compassion Mantra (藏傳大悲咒) or the Great Compassion Mantra in Sanskrit (梵音大悲咒) in Chinese-speaking regions and in Vietnam, many people unduly conflating the two texts.

We can refer to at least three sources to study this sutra, whose respective versions do not coincide exactly. The scholar Nalinaksha Dutt wrote in his book Gilgit manuscripts (1939):

Ekadasamukham. The condition of the manuscript is good. The scribe must have been a poor Sanskritist for the manuscript bristles with numerous mistakes even in spelling.

It should be kept in mind that until the discovery of the Gilgit manuscripts in 1931, the Ekadaśamukha-sūtra was known only from the Chinese and Tibetan versions, which in turn were retranslated into Sanskrit. This means that the original language text could only be studied from 1931. Unfortunately, the manuscripts found dating from the 5th or 6th century are deteriorated or incomplete, and it is often difficult to reconstruct the exact text.

Hence the differences mentioned (at best), or (at worst), the near impossibility of reconstructing the text in its entirety. The Indian scholar Nalinaksha Dutt carried out, between 1939 and 1943, a considerable work of reconstitution of the Sanskrit manuscripts, without however translating them into English.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Religion