Lably
Skip to content

History of bisexuality

Aspect of bisexuality history

  • 29 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Bisexuality, Biology and Psychology

Although the term "bisexuality" was coined in the 20th century, there are recorded examples throughout history of people having both opposite-sex and same-sex relationships.

A modern definition of bisexuality began to take shape in the mid-19th century within three interconnected domains of knowledge: biology, psychology and sexuality. In modern Western culture, the term bisexual was first defined in a binary approach as a person with romantic or sexual attraction to both men and women. The term bisexual was redefined later in the 20th century as a person who is sexually and/or romantically attracted to both males and females, or as a person who is sexually and/or romantically attracted to people regardless of sex or gender identity, which is sometimes termed pansexuality. Some distinguish between bisexuality and pansexuality.

In English, the word "bisexual" was first used in 1892 by American neurologist Charles Gilbert Chaddock when he kept the term from the source material in his translation of the seventh edition of German psychologist Krafft-Ebing's book Psychopathia Sexualis. Richard von Krafft-Ebing was the first to use the word bisexual with the meaning of having both heterosexual and homosexual attractions or, in lay terms, attraction to both men and women. Prior to Krafft-Ebing, bisexual usually meant having both female and male parts as in hermaphroditic or monoicous plants, or in the sense of mixed-sex education, meaning inclusive of both males and females.

From the 1970s onwards, bisexuality as a distinct sexual orientation gained visibility in Western literature, academia and activism. Despite a wave of research and activism around bisexuality, bisexual people have often been marginalised in literature, film and research.

Societal attitudes towards bisexuality vary by culture and history; however, there is no substantial evidence that the rate of same-sex attraction has varied across time. Prior to the contemporary discussion of sexuality as a phenomenon associated with personal identity, ancient and medieval culture viewed bisexuality as the experience of homosexual and heterosexual relationships. The cultures of ancient Greece and Rome accepted that adult men were involved in homosexual relationships, as long as they took the active role of penetration.

Ancient history

Ancient cultures and societies have conceptualised sexual desire and behaviour in a variety of ways throughout history, which are subject to debates. Many historians have pointed out the difficulty in identifying historical examples of queerness that have not been filtered through the lens of modern Western paradigms. Manuela L. Picq and Josi Tikuna wrote that "sexual diversity has historically been the norm, not the exception, among Indigenous peoples," pointing to the diversity of indigenous terms to refer to both sexual and gender identity, many of which do not translate well into contermporary English. Generally, homosexual relationships between men are more visible and recorded than those between women in literature and historical texts.

Ancient Greece

The ancient Greeks did not conceive of sexual orientation as a social identity as modern Western societies have done, or distinguish sexual desire or behavior by the gender of the participants. The main distinction was in the role that each participant played in the sex act, that of active penetrator (typically associated with masculinity) or passive penetrated (typically associated with femininity). When intercourse occurred between two people of the same sex, it still was not entirely regarded as a homosexual union, given that one partner would have to take on a passive role, and would therefore no longer be considered a 'man' in terms of the sexual union. The active penetrator was typically associated with masculinity, while the passive penetrated was typically associated with femininity. However, for Plato, both men and women could be subjects or objects. For both philosophers, however, the male hierarchy is unquestioned.

The most common form of same-sex relationships between elite males in Greece was paiderastia (pederasty) – a relationship between an older male and an adolescent youth, rooted in tribal Greek tradition. The relationship often, but not always, included sexual activity. These relationships, though temporary, often had a lasting impact on future opposite-sex relationships; in ancient Spartan weddings, the bride had her hair cropped short and was dressed as a man. It was suggested by George Devereux that this was to make the husband's transition from homosexual to heterosexual relationships easier.

Historians debate over the acceptability of homosexual relations between adult men.

There are documented examples of prominent Ancient Greeks being involved in sexual relationships with both men and women. Alexander the Great, despite having multiple wives, was known to have an intense bond with his childhood friend Hephaestion that many modern scholars have speculated could have been sexual. Socrates, who married twice in his life and had multiple children, was described by multiple students as being unable to control himself around beautiful men. Some authors document a long-term romantic relationship between Theseus and Pirithous, despite the fact that both heroes were married to women.

Examples of same-sex relationships between women are less well-documented. Pedagogic erotic relationships are also documented fin ancient Sparta, where women would sing flirtatious hymns. Sappho, a poet who wrote extensive love poems about other women, is often stylized as a lesbian in modern pop culture, but in ancient times, she was portrayed having relationships with both men and women.

Ancient Rome

Latin, and Ancient Roman culture, did not have terms for "homosexual" or "heterosexual". Instead, the primary dichotomy of ancient Roman sexuality was active / dominant / masculine and passive / submissive / feminine. In Ancient Rome a freeborn Roman performing the penetrative role could have sex with male and female partners as it was considered socially acceptable; being penetrated was considered a form of submission, and a forfeiture of personal liberty. Acceptable male partners were slaves and former slaves, prostitutes, and entertainers, whose lifestyle placed them in the nebulous social realm of infamia, so they were excluded from the normal protections afforded to a citizen even if they were technically free. Freeborn male minors were off limits at certain periods in Rome. Having sex with another freeborn man himself was considered a violation of the other man's integrity, and immoral. Sexual use of another man's slave was subject to the owner's permission. However, love or desire between males is a very frequent theme in Roman literature. In the estimation of Amy Richlin, out of the poems preserved to this day, those addressed by men to boys are as common as those addressed to women. Homoerotic scenes between both male and female couples are depicted on everyday objects, and are often found to share space with pictures of opposite-sex couples. Some have interpreted this to mean that heterosexuality and homosexuality were viewed with equal value.

There are multiple words in Latin to describe sexual preferences that would today be labeled "bisexual": both cinaedus, and pathicus indicate a male who liked to receive anal sex by men and/or women; however, these were often used as derogatory terms.

Some Roman men kept a male concubine (concubinus, "one who lies with; a bed-mate") before they married a woman. Eva Cantarella has described this form of concubinage as "a stable sexual relationship, not exclusive but privileged". After marriage, the concubinus would remain in the household and might father children with women of the household.

Some prominent Roman men have been linked to relations with both men and women. Several ancient sources claim that the emperors Nero, Marc Antony, and Elagabalus (both of whom had multiple wives) had public marriage ceremonies with other men. Gaius Lucilius, a second-century BC poet, draws comparisons between anal sex with boys and vaginal sex with females; it is speculated that he may have written a whole chapter in one of his books with comparisons between lovers of both sexes, though nothing can be stated with certainty as what remains of his oeuvre are just fragments. Several prominent authors wrote comparing sex with men and women: including Ovid, Juvenal, Lucian, Strato, and Martial.

Same-sex relations among women are far less documented and, if Roman writers are to be trusted, female homoeroticism may have been very rare, to the point that Ovid, in the Augustine era describes it as "unheard-of". However, there is scattered evidence – for example, a couple of spells in the Greek Magical Papyri – which attests to the existence of individual women in Roman-ruled provinces in the later Imperial period who fell in love with members of the same sex.

Foursomes appear in Roman art, often with two men and two women, sometimes showing two same-sex pairings. In Pompeii, where there were found the only examples known so far of Roman art depicting sexual congress between women. A frieze at a brothel annexed to the Suburban Baths, in Pompeii, shows a bisexual threesome with two men and a woman, and a foursome with two men and two women participating in homosexual anal sex, heterosexual fellatio, and homosexual cunnilingus. However, this imagery runs counter to mainstream Roman culture, and at least one writer described the scene as humorous.

Ancient China

The concept of sexual identity was not present in ancient China before Westerners' introduction of the idea. Same-sex love can sometimes be difficult to differentiate in Classical Chinese because the pronouns he and she were not distinguished. And like many East and Southeast Asian languages, Chinese does not have grammatical gender. Nevertheless, there are ancient Chinese writings depicting same-sex relationships, particularly between upper-class people. People who engaged in sexual or romantic relationships with the same sex typically also often engage in heterosexual relationships. For example, emperors who have male concubines also have female concubines and offspring. These are often allusive and implied, using phrases and words only recognizable for people who are familiar with the literary culture and background. Words like "Long Yang (龙阳 lóngyáng)" and "male trend (男風; nánfēng)" are created to describe men who are engaged in a sexual or romantic relationship with men. Confucian ideology did emphasize male friendships, and Louis Crompton has argued that the "closeness of the master-disciple bond it fostered may have subtly facilitated homosexuality". But although women's same sex relationships are less recorded compared to men's, some researchers believe that societal attitude towards same sex relationship between women were more stable compared to that of men's.

Some historians have argued that under Confucian teachings favored what would be today referred to as "bisexuality" over homosexuality. Because not having children was one of the greatest sins against filial piety, procreational bisexuality could be tolerated, but exclusive homosexuality was not. Emperors were still obligated to marry women and raise heirs, and same-sex sexual activities and relationships were merely tolerated as secondary practices.

One prominent writing produced a word that still describes a same-sex relationship – Duànxiù, or "breaking the sleeve". The story describes a relationship between the Han Emperor Ai and his male lover Dong Xian (董賢). Emperor Ai was so devoted to his male lover that he attempted to pass the throne on to him. When Emperor Ai had to leave early in the morning, the Emperor carefully cut off his sleeve to not waken Dongxian, who had fallen asleep on top of it. However, critics have cited the fact that the relationship ended in tragedy and violence to argue that the story was therefore critical rather than supportive of same-sex relationships. People in China still imitate the cutting of sleeves to express their love for same sex lovers.

Ancient Japan

The existence of men having sex with men in Japan has been documented since ancient times. There were few laws restricting sexual behaviors in Japan before the early modern period. Anal sodomy was prohibited by law in 1872, but the provision was not repealed until seven years later by the Penal Code of 1880 in accordance with the Napoleonic Code. Historical practices identified by research as homosexual include shudō (衆 道), wakashudō (若 衆 道) and nanshoku (男 色).

Several authors have noted a strong historical tradition of open bisexuality and homosexuality among male Buddhist institutions in Japan. Genshin, a Tendai priest criticised homosexuality in severe terms, but some interpreted his position as a condemnation of practices with an acolyte who was not under one's authority.

These practices are recounted in countless literary works, most of which have yet to be translated. English translations are available, however, for Ihara Saikaku, who featured a bisexual man in The Life of a Man in Love (1682), for Jippensha Ikku's account of the first gay relationship in the post-publication 'Preface' to Shank's Mare (1802 et seq), and Ueda Akinari's portrayal of a gay Buddhist monk in Tales of Moonlight and Rain (1776). Similarly, many of the greatest artists of the period, such as Hokusai and Hiroshige, took pride in documenting such love affairs in their prints, known as Ukiyo-e, pictures of the floating world, where they adopt an erotic tone, shunga or springtime pictures.

Nanshoku was not considered incompatible with heterosexuality; books of erotic prints dedicated to nanshoku often featured erotic images of young women (concubines, mekake or prostitutes, jōrō) as well as attractive teenagers (wakashū) and young cross-dressers (onnagata). Similarly, women were seen as particularly attracted to wakashū and onnagata, and it was assumed that these young men would return this interest. Nanshoku practitioners and the young men they desired would be considered bisexual in modern terminology.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in History