Lably
Skip to content

Homotherium

Extinct genus of sabertooth cat

  • 22 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Extinction and Ecosystem

Once widely distributed over most of the world's continents, the genus saw a protracted decline over the course of the Pleistocene, disappearing from Africa during the Early Pleistocene around 1.5 million years ago, and declining in abundance and distribution in Eurasia during the Middle Pleistocene, though with a handful of records in the Late Pleistocene. In North America, the genus survived until the end of the Late Pleistocene around 12,000 years ago, becoming extinct as part of the end-Pleistocene extinction event along with most other large animals native to the Americas. This followed the arrival of humans into the Americas, who may have caused a decline in populations of large prey on which Homotherium depended.

Research history and taxonomy

Eurasia

The first fossils of Homotherium were scientifically described in 1846 by Richard Owen as the species Machairodus latidens, based on Pleistocene aged canine teeth found in Kent's Cavern in Devon, southwestern England by the Reverend John MacEnery in 1826. The name Homotherium (Greek: ὁμός (homos, 'same') and θηρίον (therion, 'beast')) was proposed by Emilio Fabrini in 1890 during a review of machairodont material from the Late Pliocene-Early Pleistocene of Tuscany, Italy, without further explanation, for a new subgenus of Machairodus, whose main distinguishing feature was the presence of a large diastema (gap) between the two lower (inferior) premolars. He further described two species in this new subgenus: Machairodus (Meganthereon) crenatidens and Machairodus (Meganthereon) nestianus, both from Tuscan remains. The genus name itself was rarely used in the scientific literature until the late 1940s.

In 1918, the species Homotherium moravicum was described by Josef Woldřich based on remains found in what is now the Czech Republic. Homotherium davitashvili (also spelled davitasvilii) was described by Abesalom K. Vekua in 1972 based on fragmentary material found at the late Pliocene Kvabebi locality in Georgia in the southern Caucasus. Other material from Odessa in Ukraine was tentatively assigned to this species in 2004. In 1986, the species Homotherium darvasicum was described by Scharif Scharapov based on material from Kuruksay, Tajikistan in Central Asia. In 1989, another species Homotherium tielhardipiveteaui was named by Scharapov based on fossils also found in Tajikistan.

In 1936, Teilhard de Chardin described the new species Homotherium ultimus based on fossils from the Middle Pleistocene-aged Zhoukoudian cave complex near Beijing in northern China. Remains from the late Early Pleistocene-early Middle Pleistocene of Java in Indonesia have also been attributed to this species (as Homotherium ultimum), though others have attributed Javan remains of Homotherium to H. latidens. The also Javan Hemimachairodus zwierzyckii, originally named Epimachairodus zwierzyckii by Gustav Heinrich Ralph von Koenigswald in 1934 and placed in the new genus Hemimachairodus by the same author in 1974 (with indeterminate fossils attributed to Hemimachairodus also reported from Tajikistan), is now also regarded as a synonym of Homotherium. In 1996, Homotherium hengduanshanense was described based on fossils of Late Pliocene-Early Pleistocene age from the Hengduan Mountains of Sichuan, southwestern China. Indeterminate remains of Homotherium have been reported from the Siwalik Hills of the northern Indian subcontinent, of Early - early Middle Pleistocene age.

In a 1954 publication, Jean Viret proposed that Homotherium crenatidens was the applicable species name for much of the Homotherium material in the Late Pliocene-Early Pleistocene of Europe. While Ficcarelli in 1979 regarded H. crenatidens and H. latidens as distinct species, this was disputed by Alan Turner in a 1999 publication, who considered that the proposed morphological differences separating the two species were invalid and the two species were not distinct.

A 2014 review recognised only one species of Homotherium in Eurasia during the Late Pliocene-Pleistocene, Homotherium latidens. Other named Homotherium species from this time period, including H. crenatidens, were found not to be distinct. Across time and space, the remains of H. latidens display considerable morphological variability, though there does not appear to be any clear pattern in this variation temporally or geographically (with the exception of the presence of "pocketing" of the margin of the masseteric fossa of the mandible appearing in Middle and Late Pleistocene H. latidens, but not earlier ones), with the morphological variation of the entire span of Homotherium in Eurasia from the Late Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene being similar to the variation found at the large sample for individuals from the Incarcal locality from the Early Pleistocene of Spain, supporting a single valid species. Some older material from the Pliocene of Eastern Europe (such as that from the Odesa Catacombs in Ukraine) was tentatively considered to belong to a separate species, which a 2026 study suggested should be assigned to the species H. davitashvili. A 2026 review also supported the viewpoint of the 2014 study. Some authors have continued to recognise Homotherium crenatidens as a valid, pan-Eurasian species chronologically earlier than H. latidens, with these authors suggesting that H. crenatidens spans the Late Pliocene-Early Pleistocene, while H. latidens spans the Middle-Late Pleistocene.

Africa

In 1947/48, Camille Arambourg described the species Homotherium ethiopicum from remains found in the Omo river valley in southern Ethiopia. This publication helped popularise the genus Homotherium, which was little used prior. This species has been later regarded as a nomen dubium, with the type specimen, a lower jaw, possibly actually belonging to Dinofelis (another machairodontine) instead.

In 1972 the species Homotherium problematicum (originally Megantereon problematicus) was named by G. E. Collings, based on fragmentary material from the Makapansgat locality in northeast South Africa, of late Pliocene-Early Pleistocene age. Homotherium hadarensis was described by G. Petter and F.C. Howell in 1988, based on remains found in the Pliocene aged Hadar Formation of the Afar region of northern Ethiopia. In 2015, further material from the Hadar Formation was tentatively referred to H. hadarensis. A third species, Homotherium africanum (originally Machairodus africanus), was named by Arambourg in 1970 based on remains found in Aïn Brimba, in southern Tunisia, North Africa, dating to the early-middle Pliocene. In 1990, Alan Turner challenged the validity of H. problematicum and H. hadarensis, and later authors have generally refrained from referring African Homotherium fossils to any specific species due to their largely fragmentary nature.

In 2021, indeterminate remains of Homotherium were reported from the Tobène locality of northwestern Senegal in West Africa, dating to the Early Pliocene. Indeterminate remains of Homotherium have also been reported from the Ahl al Oughlam locality in northern Morocco, dating to the Late Pliocene.

Americas

The genus Dinobastis was named by Edward Drinker Cope in 1893, with the type species Dinobastis serus, named in the same publication based on phalanges, a partial femur and several teeth collected from western Oklahoma. In 1905, John Campbell Merriam described a new species of sabertooth cat, Machaerodus ischyrus based on a partial lower jaw found at the foot of the Temblor Range in Kern County, California. Subsequently, in 1918, Merriam reassigned it to a new genus Ischyrosmilus along with the new species Ischyrosmilus idahoensis, based on another lower jaw found in the vicinity of the Snake River in southwestern Idaho. In 1965, the species Ischyrosmilus johnstoni was described by John E. Mawby based on several partial lower jaws, a partial skull and teeth collected from Cita Canyon in Randall County in the Texas panhandle, dating to the Late Pliocene (~3-2.6 million years ago). In the same paper, Mawby noted that a comparative study of both Ischyrosmilus and Homotherium might conclude them as synonyms. Charles Stephen ("Rufus") Churcher argued in 1984 that the remains from Cita Canyon instead represented the Eurasian species Homotherium crenatidens, though Martin et al. 2011 considered them to belong to Homotherium ischyrus.

In 1966, Churcher deemed Dinobastis as a junior synonym of Homotherium, and recombined D. serus as Homotherium serum. In 1970, a new species Ischyrosmilus crusafonti was described by Charles Bertrand Schultz and Larry D. Martin based on a partial lower jaw from the Early Pleistocene of Morrill County in western Nebraska. After some debate, the genus Ischyrosmilus was declared a junior synonym of Homotherium and all four species were reassigned to that genus in a 1988 publication by Larry Martin, Charles Bertrand Schultz and Marian Othmer Schultz, as H. ischyrus, H. idahoensis, and H. johnstoni. The same paper also proposed keeping Dinobastis serus separate from Homotherium. Ischyrosmilus and Dinobastis are now generally accepted as synonyms of Homotherium. Up to five species of Homotherium have been recognised from North America: H. idahoensis, H. crusafonti, H. ischyrus, H. johnstoni, and H. serum. Martin et al. 2011 recognised two valid species in the Pliocene of North America, H. crusafonti and H. ischyrus , as well as H. serum in the Late Pleistocene (alongside possibly H. latidens in the Late Pleistocene of Alaska). Other authors suggest that there are only two well-supported North American species, with older Blancan (Pliocene-Early Pleistocene) specimens assigned to the species H. ischyrus, while the younger ones (mostly Late Pleistocene in age) are assigned to the species H. serum. H. serum is morphologically similar to the Eurasian H. latidens (to the degree that H. serum specimens would likely be classified as H. latidens if they were found in Eurasia), which may suggest that they share a close common origin, with H. serum possibly originating from a migration of H. latidens into North America rather than from earlier North American Homotherium. Some authors have considered H. serum to be a junior synonym of H. latidens.

In 2011, a new species Homotherium venezuelensis was described by Ascanio Rincón et al. based on a partially crushed skull along with several partial lower jaws and teeth collected from tar seep deposits of Early to Middle Pleistocene age (around 1-0.5 million years ago) of Monagas in northeastern Venezuela. In 2022 and 2023, Jiangzuo et al. proposed that Homotherium venezuelensis be reassigned to the closely related homotheriin genus Xenosmilus (a genus originally described for Early Pleistocene aged fossils found in Florida) which was endorsed by Manzuetti et al. in 2024. Homotheriin remains had previously been reported from South America in the form of a lower jaw from southern Uruguay in 2004, dating to sometime between the Late Pliocene and the Middle Pleistocene, which the original 2004 study and Manzuetti et al. 2024 attributed to cf. Xenosmilus. The 2022 and 2023 studies found that Xenosmilus was nested within Homotherium as traditionally defined (with H. ischyrus more closely related to Xenosmilus than to other Homotherium species), making Homotherium without including the species in Xenosmilus paraphyletic.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Animals