Lably
Skip to content

Isochrony

Rhythmic division of time in spoken language

  • 6 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Rhythm, Syllable and Language

While isochrony may be a useful theoretical framework in some contexts, studies suggest that, at best, syllable structure in natural speech has only a somewhat regular rhythm and perfectly regular speech may in fact be less intelligible. Careful linguistic analysis instead reveals that isochrony may be a subjective feature of language: more a listener perception than an inherent part of a language, making it a difficult hypothesis to test. Empirical studies have been mixed: unable to directly or fully support the hypothesis but sometimes lending support to it as a general or average tendency of languages; therefore, the concept remains controversial in linguistics. According to British phonetician Peter Roach:

there is no language which is totally syllable-timed or totally stress-timed—all languages display both sorts of timing; languages will, however, differ in which type of timing predominates. Secondly, different types of timing will be exhibited by the same speaker on different occasions and in different contexts.

History

Rhythm is an aspect of prosody, other (related) aspects being intonation, stress, and tempo of speech. Isochrony refers to rhythmic division of time into equal portions by a language. The idea was first expressed thus by Kenneth L. Pike in 1945, though the concept of language naturally occurring in chronologically and rhythmically equal measures is found at least as early as 1775 (in Prosodia Rationalis). Soames (1889) attributed the idea to Curwen. This has implications for linguistic typology: D. Abercrombie claimed "As far as is known, every language in the world is spoken with one kind of rhythm or with the other ... French, Telugu and Yoruba ... are syllable-timed languages ... English, Russian and Arabic ... are stress-timed languages."

While many linguists find the idea of different rhythm types appealing, empirical studies have not been able to find acoustic correlates of the postulated types, calling into question the validity of these types. However, when viewed as a matter of degree, relative differences in the variability of syllable duration across languages have been found.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Language and linguistics