Lably
Skip to content

Shellmidden Period

Archaeological period of the Ryukyu prehistory

  • 25 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Prehistory, Pottery and Japan

Economy is mainly based on gathering, fishing and hunting, the principal resources exploited being acorns, fishes and shellfishes. Settlements are limited in size, with the apparition of perennial villages by the end of the Early Shellmidden Period. The material culture is dominated by an important pottery production and very characteristic bone and shell artefacts.

From the 12th century, the Shellmidden Culture is followed by the Gusuku Culture, the first agricultural culture of the Okinawa Islands.

In the Sakishima Islands, the southernmost part of the Ryūkyū Archipelago, the period parallel to the Okinawan Shellmidden Period is called the Sakishima Prehistoric Period. The Amami Islands, the northernmost part of the Ryūkyū Archipelago, first showed strong cultural relation with the Shellmidden Culture, before they shifted and got closer to the Japanese cultural sphere.

Divisions

Divisions

Shellmidden Period chronologies started being developed by the 1950s. The term of "Shellmidden Period" was introduced by the Okinawa Archaeological Society in 1978.

Tawada Chronology / Current Chronology

The "Current Chronology" is based on the one established by Shinjun Tawada during the 1950s to the 1980s.

The period is called the Shellmidden Period and is divided into Initial Shellmidden Period, Early Shellmidden Period, Middle Shellmidden Period and Late Shellmidden Period. The Initial Shellmidden Period is further divided into Early Phase, Middle Phase and Late Phase.

The Initial Shellmidden Period broadly goes from 8000+ BCE to 2200 BCE, the Early Shellmidden Period goes from 2200 BCE to 1200 BCE, the Middle Shellmidden Period from 1200 BCE to 300 BCE and the Late Shellmidden Period goes from 300 BCE to the 11th-12th centuries CE.

Takamiya Chronology

This chronology, established by Hiroe Takamiya in the 1960s to the 1980s is very widely used by the Okinawan scholars. The term "Shellmidden Period" is sometimes replaced by "Okinawan Neolithic Period". The period is divided into the Early Shellmidden Period and the Late Shellmidden Period. The Late Shellmidden Period is sometimes called the Uruma Period. The Early Shellmidden Period is divided into Phases I to V, the Late Shellmidden Period in Phases I to IV. In recent articles, it is rather divided into two phases than four (Phases I and II).

The Early Shellmidden Period Phase I goes from 8000+ BCE to 4300 BCE, Phase II from 4300 BCE to 3200 BCE, Phase III from 3200 BCE to 2200 BCE, Phase IV from 2200 BCE to 1300 BCE, Phase V from 1300 BCE to 300 BCE. The Late Shellmidden Period Phase I goes from 300 BCE to 600 CE; Phase II from 600 CE to 1100 CE.

Okinawa Prefecture Chronology

This chronology was established by the Editorial Committee of Okinawa Prefecture History in 2003. It is broadly based on the divisions established by Takamiya, but uses a Japanese terminology, naming the Early Shellmidden Period the "Jōmon Period" and the Late Shellmidden Period the "Period that is contemporaneous of the Yayoi to Heian Periods" (Japanese: 弥生~平安並行時代). It is mainly used in the publications by the Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center and the Prefectural Museum.

Relations between the Shellmidden Culture of Okinawa/Amami and the Jōmon Culture of Japan

There are at least three points of view concerning the relations between the Shellmidden Culture of Okinawa/Amami and the Jōmon Culture of Japan.

The Shellmidden Culture is a sub-culture of the Japanese Jōmon Culture, and the Japanese divisions of the Jōmon Period should be applied.

This point of view used to be defended by, inter alia, Hiroe Takamiya and Isamu Chinen. Based on the first discoveries of prehistoric pottery in Okinawa (Matsumura in 1920, Tawada in 1956), the Shellmidden Period pottery was identified to Jōmon pottery. Takamiya said that the two cultures were identical at least until the phase of the Sobata Type Pottery and then gradually differed from the Early or Middle Jōmon, leading to the creation of an original culture in the Ryūkyū Archipelago. Chinen said that not only the pottery was similar, but also the lithics and bone artefacts. He said that other archaeologists insisted too much on the differences (absence of cord marking on pottery, absence of dogū ritual statuettes, absence of ritual stone sceptres, absence of storage pits) instead of focusing on the similarities.

The Shellmidden Culture and the Jōmon Culture are distinct cultures, focusing on the differences between the two cultures.

This point of view is defended by, inter alia, Shiichi Tōma, Michio Okamura, Naoko Kinoshita or Kensaku Hayashi.

The first three insist on the differences in the spiritual culture, with the absence of dogū ritual statuettes or ritual stone sceptres from sites of the Shellmidden Period in Okinawa, the fact that what is considered as jōmon cultural traits in the Shellmidden Culture, such as pit dwellings, crouched burials of humans and dogs or the burning of houses are in fact traits found in many north-east Asian cultures, while the elements that can only be found in the Jōmon Culture are absent and the fact that the body ornaments (bracelets, pendants, beads, shark teeth, earrings, butterfly-shaped artefacts) are completely different in the two cultures. Hayashi insists on the difference in the way of life, with people of the Jōmon Culture having the habit of digging storage pits to store food, which is a trait that is hardly seen in the Shellmidden Culture.

The Shellmidden Pottery is Jōmon Pottery, but the Shellmidden Culture is not Jōmon Culture, a point of view accepting both the similarities and differences of the two cultures.

This point of view is mainly defended by Shinji Itō.

He says that despite the fact certain particularities can be observed in the shapes, the pottery of the northern part of the Ryūkyū during the Jōmon Period should be called the Ryūkyū Jōmon Pottery, that there is, as far as pottery is concerned, a frontier that can be seen between the Tokara Islands and the Kumage Islands and that the Shellmidden Culture was born from the conjunction of three natural conditions (the existence of a subtropical forest, the existence of coral reefs that help provide a stable supply in marine resources, and an environment propitious to the wild boars).

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in History