Lably
Skip to content

Botanical identity of soma–haoma

  • 16 min read
  • 2 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Hindus, Rigveda and Plant

Soma/Haoma is considered to be a concoction of multiple ingredients instead of one plant, however the primary botanical plant and active ingredient is debated. In the past 250 years scholars have tried to identify this, with proposed candidates including various species of plants and or fungi. The leading scholarly consensus on the botanical identity of soma/haoma has been Ephedra (particularly Ephedra gerardiana, Ephedra intermedia, or Ephedra equisetina). Other theories currently endorse that soma/haoma was either fly-agaric mushrooms or Syrian rue. Furthermore, Ephedra has historically been the most purported due to being called som/hom/hum in South and Central Asian languages. Ephedra geradiana in particular was called Somalata (moon plant) in Sanskrit.

Researchers also suggest other plants with and without psychoactive properties, such as the perennial Peganum harmala, Nelumbo nucifera (also known as the "sacred lotus"), Cannabis sativa, the sugarcane species Tripidium bengalense (synonym Saccharum sara), the grass Phalaris aquatica, and the devil's-trumpet plant Datura metel. Fungal candidates include the fly-agaric mushroom Amanita muscaria, the psilocybin-containing mushroom Psilocybe cubensis, and the ergot fungus Claviceps purpurea. Soma/haoma has been described as being mixed with other substances (e.g. fermented mare's milk or fermented honey). Srauta Brahmins called Somayajis use Cynanchum acidum today.

Background

Avesta

Since the late 18th-century, when Abraham Hyacinthe Anquetil-Duperron and others made portions of the Zoroastrian Avesta available to Western scholarship, several scholars have sought a representative botanical equivalent of the haoma as described in the texts and as used in living Zoroastrian practice. Most of the proposed identifications have drawn primarily upon either linguistic evidence, comparative pharmacology, or reflected ritual use, but not all three: rarely have all three sources of evidence been considered in conjunction. Such unbalanced approaches to the problem of identity have resulted usually in the speedy rejection of these poorly-substantiated theories.

Vedas

The Rigveda calls the plant soma, and gives it precedence above Indra and the other Gods calling soma "a God for Gods".

Based on "RV 8.48"., Soma has been generally assumed to be entheogenic. (Note, there are numerous similar references in the Vedas, e.g. "RV 9.4"., "RV 9.5"., "RV 9.8"., "RV 9.10"., "RV 9.42".) Some descriptions of soma are associated with tapas (heat, excitement, "energy"). Soma is associated with the warrior-god Indra, and appears to have been drunk before battle. For these reasons, there are stimulant (ephedrine-like) plants as well as entheogenic plants among the candidates that have been suggested. Soma is also often associated with light and Indra is the "Lord of Light" as shown in "RV 8.82.25".

For thee, O Lord of Light, are shed these Soma-drops, and grass is strewn. Bring Indra to his worshippers. May Indra give thee skill, and lights of heaven, wealth to his votary. And priests who praise him: laud ye him.

Texts like the Atharva Veda (and also texts of the Brahmana class) extol the medicinal properties of soma and it was regarded as the king of medicinal herbs.

Account of Swami Rama

In his autobiography, Swami Rama recalls contacting an Indian herbologist and Vedic scholar named Vaidya Bhairavdutt, who is described as "the only living authority on soma". Bhairavdutt comes to visit the swami, bringing about a pound of the herb with him. He informs the swami that though the plant's effects can be likened to that of psychedelic mushrooms, it is definitely not a mushroom, but rather a succulent plant. Bhairavdutt convinces the swami to join him in partaking the soma. The taste, says Swami Rama, is "a little bit bitter and sour." Bhairavdutt becomes inebriated and dances wildly, claiming he is Shiva. Several students attempt to restrain the apparently slightly built Bhairavdutt, but are unable to do so. Meanwhile, Swami Rama develops a crippling headache, a symptom which is compatible with the effects of high doses of ephedrine. No hallucinogenic effects are described by Swami Rama.

Sign in to keep reading

One more chapter is free with a Lably account.

More in Religion