Lably
Skip to content

The Amitāyus Sutra

Popular Sutra in Mahāyāna Buddhism

  • 18 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through India and Kushan Empire

The Amitāyus Sutra contains the past-life tale of Dharmākara Bodhisattva, who would go on to become Buddha Amitābha. It also explains how he gave rise to the Original Vows which led to the creation of the Pure Land of Sukhavati. The title of the sutra is often translated in English as either the Sutra [on the Buddha] of Immeasurable Life, or simply the Immeasurable Life Sutra. The Immeasurable Life Sutra is one of the three central scriptures of East Asian Pure Land Buddhism, and is widely revered and chanted by Pure Land Buddhists throughout Asia.

History and versions of the text

Some scholars believe that the Longer Sukhāvatīvyūha Sūtra was compiled in the age of the Kushan Empire in the first and second centuries by an order of Mahīśāsaka monastics who flourished in the Gandhāra region. It is likely that the longer Sukhāvatīvyūha owed greatly to the Lokottaravāda sect as well for its compilation, and in this sūtra there are many elements in common with the Mahāvastu.

The earliest of the Chinese translations show traces of having been translated from the Gāndhārī language, a prakrit used in the Northwest. It is also known that manuscripts in the Kharoṣṭhī script existed in China during this period.

The various versions of the sutra use various titles including Sutra of Amitāyus, Array of Amitābha (Amitābha-vyūha), and the Array of the Blissful Land (Sukhāvatīvyūha), a title it shares with the shorter Amitābha Sūtra.

In East Asian Buddhism it is most widely known as the Sutra of Immeasurable Life (simplified Chinese: 佛说无量寿经; traditional Chinese: 佛說無量壽經; pinyin: Fóshuō Wúliàngshòu Jīng; Sutra of Immeasurable Life Spoken by Buddha; Vietnamese: Phật Thuyết Vô Lượng Thọ Kinh; Japanese: Bussetsu Muryōju Kyō).

Versions

Traditionally the Longer Sukhāvatīvyūha Sūtra is believed to have been translated into Chinese twelve times from Indic language sources from 147 to 713 CE. Only five translations are extant in the Chinese Buddhist canon.

The five Chinese translations are (in order of translation date):

  • Foshuo amituo sanyesanfo saloufotan guodu rendao jing (佛説阿彌陀三耶三佛薩樓佛檀過度人 道經; T. 362) - traditionally attributed to the translator Zhi Qian, but it is likely a translation of Lokakṣema (2nd century CE) or someone in his lineage. This is also called the Han translation and is likely the earliest version currently extant.
  • Foshuo wuliangqingjing pingdengjue jing (佛説無量清淨平等覺經; T. 361), most likely the work of Zhi Qian (3rd-century). It is likely a revision of T.362 which introduces some verse passages. This is also called the Wu translation.
  • Fóshuō Wúliángshòu Jīng (佛説無量壽經; T. 360) in two fascicles, by Buddhabhadra (359–429 ce) and his assistant Baoyun (寶雲; 376–449 ce). Traditionally it has also been attributed to Saṅghavarman at the White Horse Temple in Luoyang, though modern scholars now disagree with this. This is also called the Wei translation. This edition is the most common edition studied in East Asian Buddhism and it represents "an intermediate stage in the transmission of the larger Sukhāvatīvyūhasūtra".
  • Wuliangshou rulai hui (無量壽如來會; T. 310), which is part of the composite Mahāratnakūṭasutra, which was translated by Bodhiruci II (late 6th-century and early 7th-century). This text reflects a "later recension" of the text than the previous three. It is called the "Tang translation."
  • Foshuo dasheng wuliangshou zhuangyan jing (佛説大乘無量壽莊嚴經; T. 363), by Faxian (法賢; Dharmabhadra; also known as Tianxizai [天息災]; fl. 980–1000). This is often called the "Song translation" and it reflects a later recension of the Sukhāvatīvyūha.

Each of the five Chinese translations have different linguistic styles and differ slightly in content. For example, regarding the number of vows, the Han and Wu translations both have twenty-four vows and similar content, suggesting they derive from the same source text. Harrison considers these two to be archaic Chinese translations of an early Indic text of the Sukhāvatīvyūha. The Wei and Tang translations both have forty-eight vows, while the later Song translation has thirty-six vows and likely comes from a different Indic source.

Furthermore, there is a Tibetan translation, which is similar to the last two later recensions in Chinese. This is the ’Phags pa ’od dpag med kyi bkod pa (*Āryāmitābhavyūha; D 49/P 760) translated in the 9th century by Jinamitra, Dānaśīla, and Ye shes sde.

In addition to the translations, the Sūtra is also extant in Sanskrit, surviving in a late Nepalese manuscript. The Sanskrit has been directly translated into English by F. Max Mueller. It is a "late recension" type similar to the Tibetan edition.

There are also several fragments of another earlier version in Sanskrit (found in the manuscripts of the Schøyen Collection), along with fragments of Uighur, Khotanese, and Xixia translations.

According to Luis O. Gomez, there are some significant differences between the Sanskrit and the Chinese edition of Buddhabhadra / Saṅghavarman. Gomez writes:

the order of the narrative and the argument deviate, sometimes only on minor points, sometimes in major ways; differences in content occur throughout, and range from a regrouping and rearrangement of important themes (in the content and structure of the verse portions, for instance, and in the vows), to significant omissions and additions. The parallels, however, are more and stronger than the divergences, so that our understanding of one version may still benefit from our reading of the other. Two long passages in Sanghavarman's version have no correspondence in the Sanskrit (or, for that matter, in the Tibetan) versions. These passages are probably "interpolations," but we have no way of knowing for certain today where and when they were added to the text.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Religion