Lably
Skip to content

Vietnamese language

Austroasiatic language

  • 39 min read
  • 12 chapters
Areas of Vietnam where Vietnamese is the native language.
Kwamikagami · CC BY-SA 3.0

Explore on Lably

ToursExplore Lably’s 3D tours

Like many languages in Southeast Asia and East Asia, Vietnamese is an isolating language (highly analytic) and is tonal. Structurally, Vietnamese is mixed between head-initial and head-final directionalities: head-initial is more prominent in clausal structures while head-final may appear more in compounds, and modifiers generally follow the words they modify but sometimes precede them as well. Syntactically, Vietnamese is topic-prominent and strictly subject–verb–object. It also uses noun classifiers.

Vietnamese morphemes and phonological words are predominantly monosyllabic; however, many multisyllabic words do occur, usually as a result of compounding and reduplication. This aspect of Vietnamese allows for great efficiency in day-to-day writing, communication, and much more. Borrowings from Middle Chinese, known as Sino-Vietnamese vocabulary, make up a significant and important part of the lexicon. The vocabulary has also had influence from French.

Vietnamese currently is written using a Latin-based alphabet known as chữ Quốc ngữ. The alphabet largely relies on 17th-century Portuguese orthography, and was officially adopted in the early 20th century during French rule of Vietnam. It uses digraphs and diacritics to mark tones and some phonemes. Vietnamese was historically written using chữ Nôm, a logographic script composed of Chinese characters (called chữ Hán) and locally created characters to represent native Vietnamese words and sounds.

Classification

Early linguistic work in the late 19th and early 20th centuries (Logan 1852, Forbes 1881, Müller 1888, Kuhn 1889, Schmidt 1905, Przyluski 1924, and Benedict 1942) classified Vietnamese as belonging to the Mon–Khmer branch of the Austroasiatic language family (which also includes the Khmer language spoken in Cambodia, and various smaller or regional languages, such as the Munda and Khasi languages spoken in eastern India, and others in Laos, southern China, and parts of Thailand). In 1850, British lawyer James Richardson Logan detected striking similarities between the Korku language in Central India and Vietnamese. He suggested that Korku, Mon, and Vietnamese were part of what he termed "Mon–Annam languages" in a paper published in 1856. Later, in 1920, French-Polish linguist Jean Przyluski found that Mường is more closely related to Vietnamese than other Mon–Khmer languages, and a Viet– Mường subgrouping was established, also including Thavung, Chut, Cuoi, and others. The term "Vietic" was proposed by Hayes (1992), who proposed to redefine Viet–Mường as referring to a subbranch of Vietic containing only Vietnamese and Mường. The term "Vietic" is used by Gérard Diffloth, among others, with a slightly different proposal on subclassification, within which the term "Viet–Mường" refers to a lower subgrouping (within an eastern Vietic branch) consisting of Vietnamese dialects, Mường dialects, and Nguồn (of Quảng Bình Province).

Sign in to keep reading

11 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Language