Lably
Skip to content

Mon people

Ethnic group of Southeast Asia

  • 28 min read
  • 6 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Ethnicity, Buddhism and British people

The Mon were one of the earliest to reside in Southeast Asia, and were responsible for the spread of Theravada Buddhism in Mainland Southeast Asia. The civilizations founded by the Mon were some of the earliest in Thailand as well as Myanmar and Laos. The Mon are regarded as a large exporter of Southeast Asian culture. Historically, many cities in Myanmar, Thailand, and Laos today, including Yangon, Pathum Thani, Lamphun, Lampang, and Vientiane were founded either by the Mon people or Mon rulers.

Nowadays, the Mon are a major ethnic group in Myanmar and a minor ethnic group in Thailand. The Mons from Myanmar are called Burmese Mon or Myanmar Mon. The Mons from Thailand are referred as Thai Raman or Thai Mon. The Mon dialects of Thailand and Myanmar are mutually intelligible.

Ethnonyms

The Mon have been referred to by different names by different groups throughout history. During the pre-colonial era, the Burmese called them Talaing (တလိုင်း), which was adopted by the British during the colonial era. The term "Peguan" was also used by Europeans when Pegu was the capital of Lower Myanmar.

The use of "Talaing" has been found on inscriptions dating back to the 11th century, but it is now considered pejorative and is little used. It survives in fixed historical terms, among them the eponymous song genre in the Mahagita, the corpus of Burmese classical songs. The etymology of Talaing is debated; it may be derived from Mon, or is a reference to Telinga or Kalinga, a geographic region in southeast India. During the 12th century, the term acquired a derogatory connotation within the Mon community, when it became used by the Mon as a disparaging epithet for the mixed offspring of Mon women and foreign men.

The term "Mon" (spelt မန် in Mon and မွန် in Burmese), which is synonymous with the Burmese word for 'noble,' was likely derived from Old Mon "rmeñ" by way of Middle Mon "rman" (ရာမန်). The ethnonym "rmeñ" was first recorded in the Kyanzittha's New Palace Inscription of AD 1102 in Myanmar. Derivatives of this ethnonym have been found in 6th to 10th-century Old Khmer and 11th-century Javanese inscriptions. One such instance is the pre-Angkorian inscription of Prasat Bassac, K.71, where ramañ stands in the name of a slave. Walailak Songsiri cites it in arguing that the Rāmanya of the Khmer inscription K.1198 need not denote a Mon country. A later Khmer instance may stand in the Preah Khan stele of Jayavarman VII, dated śaka 1113 or 1114, that is 1191 or 1192. Its closing verse asks that the people attached to the king's foundations be preserved, Pukāṃ and Rvañ among them. Cœdès took the two for Burmese and Mon; Thomas Maxwell, editing the inscription, reports the reading and does not adopt it. The geographic term Rāmaññadesa, which now refers to the Mon heartland on the Burmese coast, was coined by King Dhammazedi in 1479. The usefulness of Mon as an ethnic category has itself been questioned. Michael Aung-Thwin holds that Mon and Pyu as ethnic units are constructions of British colonial scholarship. Elizabeth Moore calls the terms over-simplistic and would read pre-Bagan Myanmar through landscape and interaction instead. Donald Stadtner defends both categories, and objects in particular to the claimed lack of archaeological evidence in lower Myanmar.

The Mon of Myanmar are divided into three sub-groups by ancestral region in Lower Myanmar. Mon Nya (မန်ည; come from Pathein (the Irrawaddy Delta) in the west, Mon Tang (မန်ဒိုင်; ) from Bago in the central region, and Mon Teh (မန်ဒ; ) from Mottama in the southeast.

Sign in to keep reading

5 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Cities